Original Scientific Article
Shelter dogs and their destiny. A retrospective analysis to identify predictive factors - a pilot study
Simona Cannas
*
,
Fancesca Rampini
,
Diana Levi
,
Emanuela Dalla Costa
,
Zita Talamonti
,
Michela Minero
,
Clara Palestrini
Received: 23 April 2014
Received in revised form: 02 June 2014
Accepted: 04 July 2014
Available Online First: 22 July 2014
Published on: 15 October 2014
Correspondence: Simona Cannas, simona.cannas@guest.unimi.it
Abstract
Consequences of a long stay in dog shelter have particular signifi cance, because, since 1991,the Italian law (14/08/1991, n.281) prohibits euthanasia of dogs unless “they are seriously ill, incurable or proven dangerous”. Caught dogs are recovered for a quarantine period in the sanitary kennel, if they are not returned to the owner, they are moved to shelters until adoption or death. The aim of this work was to identify the relationship between dogs characteristics and their destiny in order to defi ne useful predictors to better manage the stay of dogs in shelter. We analysed the records of all dogs recovered in a sanitary kennel from 2005 to 2010 and subsequently moved to shelters (n=771). Descriptive and inferential statistics were performed in order to investigate possible factors that might affect adoptability of sheltered dogs. The characteristics of dogs that spent more time in PVCS, before being transfer to the CR, were: large size, male gender and age between 11 months and 2 years (p ≤ 0,05). Male dogs spent more days in CR, as opposed to female (p ≤ 0,05). In our sample 76% dogs were adopted, 18% were still in the shelter, 4% died and 2% were euthanized. Female dogs were adopted more than males; young dogs more than elderly (over seven years); sizesmedium and small more than large. It would be interesting use the data from this research and complete them with information regarding dogs behaviour, to better manage dogs during the stay in shelter and to improve their relocation.
Keywords: dog, shelter, welfare
References
1. Mondelli, F., Prato Previde, E., Verga, M, Levi, D., Magistrelli, S., Valsecchi, P. (2004). The bond that never developed: adoption and relinquishment of dogs in a rescue shelter. J. Appl. Anim. Welfare Sci.7 (4), 253-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327604jaws0704_3 PMid:15857811
2. Wells, D.L., Hepper, P.G. (2000). Prevalence of behaviour problems reported by owners of dogs purchased from an animal rescue shelter. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 69 (1), 55-65. PMid: 10856784
3. Manfredi, A. (2013). Pet population in Italy. Assalco-Zoomarkreport 2013. Professioneveterinaria 18, 3-12.
4. Ausman, B. (2004). People, pets and wills - taking care of our pets. Can.Vet. J. 45 (1), 67-72. PMid:14992257; PMCid:PMC2749588
6. Overall, K.L. (2013). Manual of clinical behavioral medicine for dogs and cats. Elselvier, St Louis, MO
7. Kass, P.H., New, J.C., Scarlett, J.M., Salman, M.D. (2001). Understanding animal companion surplus in the United States: relinquishment of non-adoptable to animal shelters for euthanasia. J. Appl. Anim. Welfare Sci. 4 (4), 237-248. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15327604JAWS0404_01
8. New J.C. Jr, Salman, M.D., Scarlett, J.M., Kass, P.H., Vaughn, J.A., Scherr, S., Kelch, W.J. (1999). Moving: characteristics of dogs and cats and those relinquishing them to 12 U.S. animal shelters. J. Appl. Anim. Welfare Sci. 2 (2), 83-95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327604jaws0202_1 PMid:16363948
9. New, J.C. Jr, Salman, M.D., Scarlett, J.M., Kass, P.H., King, M., Hutchison, J.M. (2000). Characteristics of shelter-relinquished animals and their owners compared with animals and their owners in U.S. pet-owning households. J. Appl. Anim. Welfare Sci. 3 (3), 179-201. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15327604JAWS0303_1
11. Tuber, D.S., Miller, D. D., Caris, K.A., Halter, R., Linden, F., Hennessy, M.B. (1999). Dog in animal shelters: problems, suggestions and needed expertise. Psychol Sci. 10 (5), 379-386. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00173
13. Verga, M., Michelazzi, M. (2009). Companion animal welfare and possible implications on the human-pet relationship. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 8 (1), 231-240.
15. Beerda, B., Childer, M.B., Van Hooff, J.A., De Vries, H.W., Mol, J.A. (1999). Chronic stress in dogs subjected to social and spatial restriction. Physiol. Behav. 66 (2), 233-242. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9384(98)00289-3
16. Wells, D.L., Graham, L., Hepper, P.G. (2002). The influence of auditory stimulation on the behaviour of dogs housed in a rescue shelter. Anim. Welfare. 11, 385-393.
17. Patronek, G.J., Glickman, L.T., Beck, A.M., McCabe, G.P., Ecker, C. (1996). Risk factors for relinquishment of dogs to animal shelters. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 209, 572–581. PMid:8755975
18. Lepper, M., Kass, P.H., Hart, L.A. (2002). Prediction of adoption versus euthanasia among dogs and cats in a California animal shelter. J. Appl. Anim. Welfare Sci. 5 (1), 29-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15327604JAWS0501_3 PMid:12738587
19. Normando, S., Stefanini, C., Meers, L., Adamelli, S., Coultis, D., Bono, G. (2006). Some factors influencing adoption of sheltered dogs. Anthrozoos. 19 (3), 211-224.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2752/089279306785415556
20. Posage, J.M., Bartlett, P.C., Thomas, D.K. (1998). Determining factors for successful adoption of dogs from an animal shelter. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 213 (4), 478-482. PMid:9713528
22. Notaro, S.J. (2004). Disposition of shelter companion animals from nonhuman animal control officers, citizen finders, and relinquished by caregivers. J. Appl. Anim. Welfare Sci. 7 (3), 181-188. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327604jaws0703_4 PMid:15498725
24. Segurson, S.A, Serpell, J.A., Hart, B.A. (2005). Evaluation of behavioural assessment questionnaire for use in the characterization of behavioural problems of dogs relinquished to animal shelters. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 215, 1288-1291.
Copyright
© 2014 Cannas S. This is an open-access article published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors declared that they have no potential conflict of interest with respect to the authorship and/or publication of this article.
Citation Information
Macedonian Veterinary Review. Volume 37, Issue 2, Pages 151-156, p-ISSN 1409-7621, e-ISSN 1857-7415, DOI: 10.14432/j.macvetrev.2014.07.018, 2014