Original Scientific Article
Visibly marked and microchipped lost dogs have a higher chance to find their owners in Belgrade
Marijana Vučinić * ,
Katarina Radisavljević ,
Alexandra Hammond-Seaman ,
Vlatko Ilieski

Mac Vet Rev 2015; 38 (1): 79 - 83

10.14432/j.macvetrev.2014.12.035

Received: 03 July 2014

Received in revised form: 24 November 2014

Accepted: 30 November 2014

Available Online First: 03 December 2014

Published on: 15 March 2015

Correspondence: Marijana Vučinić, vucinicm@vet.bg.ac.rs
PDF HTML

Abstract

The aim of the study was to analyse the demographic characteristics of lost and found dogs in Belgrade, Serbia. The demographic data concerning the 246 lost and 81 found dogs in the period of 5 consecutive years (January, 2009 to January 2014) was sampled and analysed from the data bases of four organizations for animal protection in Belgrade. The recovery rate of lost dogs and the chance to be reunited again with their owners was 33%. The highest recovery rate was estimated in the category of lost dogs with visible marks such as tags or collars (30%).The chi-square test disclosed that besides dogs with special visible marks, significantly more females, light colour coated, friendly/sociable and neutered dogs were reunited with their owners (P<0.0001).

Keywords: demographic characteristics, dog, found, lost


References

1. Archer J, Why do people love their pets?Evol Hum Behav 1997; 1: 8237-259. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0162-3095(99)80001-4.
2. Cohen S.P, Can pets function as family membersWestern J Nurs Res 2002; 24: 621-638. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/019394502320555386.
3. Dotson J. M, Hyatt M. E, Understanding dog–human companionshipJ Bus Res 2008; 61: 457-466. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.07.019.
4. Friedmann E, Son H, The human–companion animal bond:How humans benefitVet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2009; 39: 293-326. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cvsm.2008.10.015. PMid:19185195
5. Mosteller J, Animal-companion extremes and underlying consumer themesJ Bus Res 2008; 61: 512-521. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.07.004.
6. Beverland B. M, Farrelly F, Lim E. A. C, Exploring the dark side of pet ownership:Status and control-based pet consumptionJ Bus Res 2008; 61: 490-496.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.08.009.
7. Knight S, In the company of wolves:The physical, social, and psychological benefits of dog ownershipJ Aging Health 2008; 20: 437-455. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0898264308315875. PMid:18448686
8. McConnell R. A, Brown M. C, Shoda M. T, Stayton E. L, Colleen E. M, Friends with benefits:On the positive consequences of pet ownershipJ Pers Soc Psychol 2011; 101: 1239-1252. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0024506. PMid:21728449
9. Jagoe A, Serpell J, Owner characteristics and interactions and the prevalence of canine behaviour problemsAppl Anim Behav Sci 1996; 47: 31-42.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0168-1591(95)01008-4.
10. Bennett C. P, Rohlf I. V, Owner-companion dog interactions:Relationships between demographic variables, potentially problematic behaviours, training engagement and shared activitiesAppl Anim Behav Sci 2007; 102: 65-84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2006.03.009.
11. Arhant C, Bubna-Littitz H, Bartels A, Futschik A, Troxler J, Behaviour of smaller and larger dogs:Effects of training methods, inconsistency of owner behaviour and level of engagement in activities with the dogAppl Anim Behav Sci 2010; 123: 131-142. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2010.01.003.
12. Lepper M, Kass P. H, Hart L. A, Prediction of adoption versus euthanasia among dogs and cats in a California animal shelterJ Appl Anim Welf Sci 2002; 5: 29-42.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15327604JAWS0501_3. PMid:12738587
13. Lord K. L, Ingwersen W, Gray L. J, Wintz J. D, Characterization of animals with microchips entering animal sheltersJ Am Vet Med Assoc 2009; 235: 160-167.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2460/javma.235.2.160. PMid:19601734
14. Rohlf V. I, Bennett P. C, Toukhsati S, Why do even committed dog owners fail to comply with some responsible ownership practices?Anthrozoos 2010; 23: 143-155.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2752/175303710X12682332909972.
15. Weiss E, Slater M, Lord L, Retention of provided identification for dogs and cats seen in veterinary clinics and adopted from shelters in Oklahoma City, OK, USAPrev Vet Med 2011; 101: 301-315. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2011.05.008. PMid:21704398
16. Dingman P, Levy J, Rockey L, Crandal M, Use of visual and permanent identification for pets by veterinary clinicsVet J 2014; 201: 46-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2014.04.024. PMid:24907866
17. Houpt K.A, Goodwin D, Uchida Y, Baranyiová E, Fatjó J, Kakuma Y, Proceedings of a workshop to identify dog welfare issues in the US, Japan, Czech Republic, Spain and the UKAppl. Anim Behav Sci 2007; 106: 221-233. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2007.01.005.
18. Lord L. K, Wittum E. T, Ferketich K. A, Funk A. J, Rajala-Schultz J. P, Search and identification methods that owners use to find a lost dogJ Am Vet Med Assoc 2007; 230: 211-216. http://dx.doi.org/10.2460/javma.230.2.211. PMid:17223753
19. Lord L, Wittum E. T, Ferketich K. A, Funk A. J, Rajala-Schultz J. P, Search methods that people use to find owners of lost petsJ Am Vet Med Assoc 2007; 230: 1835-1840.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2460/javma.230.12.1835. PMid:17571985
20. Weiss E, Slater M, Lord L, Frequency of lost dogs and cats in the United States and the methods used to locate themAnimals 2012; 2: 301-315. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani2020301.
21. Pulczer S. A, Jones-Bitton A, Waltner-Toews D, Dewey E. C, Owned dog demography in Todos Santos Cuchumatán, GuatemalaPrev Vet Med 2013; 108: 209-217.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2012.07.012. PMid:22906504
22. Slater R. M, Di Nardo A, Pediconi O, Dalla Villa P, Candeloro L, Alessandrini B, Del Papa S, Cat and dog ownership and management patterns in central ItalyPrev Vet Med 2008; 85: 267-294. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2008.02.001. PMid:18374434
23. Blecker D, Hiebert N, Kuhne F, Preliminary study of the impact of different dog features on humans in publicJ Vet Behav 2013; 8: 170-174.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jveb.2012.06.005.
24. Gazzano A, Zilocchi M, Mariti C, Dogs’ features strongly affect people’s feelings and behavior toward themJ Vet Behav 2013; 8: 213-220. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jveb.2012.10.005.
25. Cannas S, Rampini F, Levi D, Costa ED, Talamonti Z, Minero M, Palestrini C, Shelter dogs and their destiny. A retrospective analysis to identify predictive factors - a pilot studyMac Vet Rev 2014; 37: 151-156. http://dx.doi.org/10.14432/j.macvetrev.2014.07.018.
26. Leonard A, The plight of “Big black dogs” in American animal shelters:Color-based canine discriminationPap Kroeber Anthropol Soc 2011; 99: 168-183.
27. Goleman M, Drozd L, Karpinski M, Czyzowski P, Black dog syndrome in animal sheltersMed Weter 2014; 70: 122-127.


Copyright

© 2015 Vučinić M. This is an open-access article published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declared that they have no potential conflict of interest with respect to the authorship and/or publication of this article.

Citation Information

Macedonian Veterinary Review. Volume 38, Issue 1, Pages 79-83, p-ISSN 1409-7621, e-ISSN 1857-7415, DOI: 10.14432/j.macvetrev.2014.12.035, 2015