Original Scientific Article
Clinical testing of combined vaccine against enzootic pneumonia in industrial pig farming in Bulgaria
Roman Pepovich * ,
Branimir Nikolov ,
Ivo Sirakov ,
Krasimira Genova ,
Kalin Hristov ,
Elena Nikolova ,
Radka Hajiolova ,
Boika Beltova

Mac Vet Rev 2015; 38 (2): 195 - 201

10.14432/j.macvetrev.2015.07.051

Received: 27 April 2015

Received in revised form: 10 July 2015

Accepted: 13 July 2015

Available Online First: 24 July 2015

Published on: 15 October 2015

Correspondence: Roman Pepovich, rpepovich@abv.bg
PDF HTML

Abstract

In the pig farm with signs of a respiratory disease complex and laboratory confirmed enzootic pneumonia, the prophylactic efficacy of the combination vaccine (M. hyo+PCV2), a single injection administered intramuscularly 21 days after birth, at a dose of 2 ml was tested. The clinical condition, pathological changes in the lungs and some epidemiological and economic results were reported. It was found that vaccinated pigs are in a better clinical condition in comparison with the control group. Morbidity in the rearing period was reduced from 16.3% in the control group to 6.0% in vaccinated pigs, and in the fattening period, respectively, from 30.6% in the control group to 10.0% in the vaccinated group. Pathological features in the lung characteristic for the enzootic pneumonia in the vaccinated pigs were reduced from 25.5%±7.24 to 4.0%±2.44, and PCVI - from 13.0%±4.66 to 0%. Vaccination of pigs has been received and a higher average daily gain in groups for rearing (0.624 kg) and for fattening (0.723 kg) was recorded.

Keywords: Enzootic pneumonia, Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae, pigs, vaccination


References

1. Aiguo W, Yanlong Li, Longquan Yao, Liande Zhu, Tan Tao, Efficacy of Ingelvac Mycoflex® 2013;
2. In a chinese farm. The 6th Asian Pig Veterinary Society Congress Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam 2013; September23-25PO35-
3. Dawson A, Harvey R.E, Thevasagayam S.J, Sherington J, Studies of the field efficacy and safety of a single-dose Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae vaccine for pigsVet. Rec 2002; 151: 535-538. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/vr.151.18.535. PMid:12448490
4. Eggen A, Schmidt U, Raes M, Witvliet M, One-dose vaccination against M. hyo and PCV2Pig Progress 2010; 23:
5. Georgakis A.D, Bourtzi-Hatzopoulou E, Kritas S.K, Balkamos G.C, Kyriakis S.C, A study on the Porcine Respiratory Disease Syndrome (PRDC):Update review and proposed measures for its controlJ Hellenic Vet Med Society 2002; 53: 265-271.
6. Hodgins D, Shewen P, Dewey C, Influence of age and maternal antibodies on antibody responses of neonatal piglets vaccinated against Mycoplasma hyopneumoniaeJ. Swine Hlth. Prod 2004; 12: 10-16.
7. Jayappa H, Davis B, Rapp-Gabrielson V, Wasmoen T, Thacker E, Evaluation of the efficacy of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae bacterin following immunization of young pigs in the presence of varying levels of maternal antibodies 2001; Nashville, Tennessee: Proc. 32nd Annual Meeting Am. Assoc. Swine Vet; 237-241.
8. Kristensen Ch, Vinther J, Svensmark B, Baekbo P, A field evaluation of two vaccines against Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae infection in pigsActa Veterinaria Scandinavica 2014; 56: 241-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1751-0147-56-24.
9. Maes D, Deluyker H, Verdonck M, Castryck F, Miry C, Vrijens B, Verbeke W, Viaene J, De Kruif A, Effect of vaccination against Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae in pig herds with an all-in/all-out production systemVaccine 1999; 17: 1024-1034. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0264-410X(98)00254-0.
10. Maes D, Verbeke W, Vicca J, Verdonck M, De Kruif A, Benefit to cost of vaccination against Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae in pig herds under Belgian market conditions from 1996 to 2000Livestock Production Science 2003; 83: 85-93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(03)00039-3.
11. Maes D, Segales J, Meyns T, Sibila M, Pieters M, Haesebrouck F, Control of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae infections in pigsVet. Microbiol 2008; 126: 297-309.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.09.008. PMid:17964089
12. Pallares F.J, Gomez S, Munoz A, Evaluation of zootechnical parameters of vaccinating against swine enzootic pneumonia under ield conditionsVet. Rec 2001; 148: 104-107. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/vr.148.4.104. PMid:11232924
13. Thacker E. L, Leman A.D, Straw B.E, D’Allaire S, Mengeling W.L, Taylor D.J, Mycoplasmal diseasesDiseases of Swine 2006; 9th ed. Ames, IA: The Iowa State University Press; 701-717.
14. Wallgren P, Vallgarda J, Lindberg M, Eliason-Selling L, The efficacy of different vaccination strategies against Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae 2000; Melbourne, Australia: In Proc. of the 16-th IPVS Congress; 461-
15. Villarreal I, Vranckx K, Duchateau L, Pasmans F, Haesebrouck F, Jensen J, Nanjiani L, Maes D, Early Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae infections in European suckling pigs in herds with respiratory problems:detection rate and risk factorsVeterinarni Medicina 2010; 55: 7318-324.


Acknowlegment

This research work was carried out with the support of University of Forestry and the project BG051PO001-3.3.06-0056 “Support for the development of young people in the University of Forestry”, Operational Programme “Human Resources Development” financed by the European Social Fund of the European Union.

Copyright

© 2015 Pepovich R. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium provided the original work is properly cited.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declared that they have no potential conflict of interest with respect to the authorship and/or publication of this article.

Citation Information

Macedonian Veterinary Review. Volume 38, Issue 2, Pages 195-201, p-ISSN 1409-7621, e-ISSN 1857-7415, DOI:  10.14432/j.macvetrev.2015.07.051, 2015