Original Scientific Article
PCR assay with host specific internal control for Staphylococcus aureus from bovine milk samples
Zafer Cantekin * ,
Yasar Ergun ,
Hasan Solmaz ,
Gamze Özge Özmen ,
Melek Demir ,
Radhwane Saidi

Mac Vet Rev 2015; 38 (1): 97 - 100

10.14432/j.macvetrev.2015.01.038

Received: 13 November 2014

Received in revised form: 13 January 2015

Accepted: 20 January 2015

Available Online First: 27 January 2015

Published on: 15 March 2015

Correspondence: Zafer Cantekin, zcantekin@hotmail.com
PDF

Abstract

Staphylococcus aureus is considered as one of the most important and common pathogens of bovine mastitis. Polymerase Chain Reaction is frequently proposed in the diagnosis of S. aureus directly from milk samples instead of classical culture. However, false-negative results may occur in the polymerase chain reaction analysis performed directly from clinical material. For the purpose of disclosing the false negative results, the use of internal amplification controls can be beneficial. Therefore, in this study a new polymerase chain reaction technique with host specific internal amplification control was developed by optimizing S. aureus-specific primers in combination with bovine specific primers. The effectiveness of the developed technique in this study was attempted in milk samples from bovine subclinical mastitis. This technique has the potential to detect S. aureus from bovine milk samples or dairy products.

Keywords: bovine milk, internal control, polymerase chain reaction, Staphylococcus aureus

INTRODUCTION

Staphylococcus aureus, one of the most prevalent pathogens of clinical and subclinical bovine mastitis, can spread rapidly throughout the herd if management precautions are not taken (1, 2). S. aureus is one of the most important and common pathogens of bovine mastitis. It causes significant economic losses in the dairy industry (3). S. aureus damages milk-producing tissue and significantly decreases milk yield. In the early stages of infection, damage may be reversible, but when diagnosis is delayed, tissue damage is excessive and irreversible (4). Therefore, a rapid and reliable method of identifying the bacteria responsible for mastitis is important for disease management in the herd (5). Moreover, S. aureus infections are considered a serious problem that may affect public health because they can be transmitted by milk and milk products (6).

While different methods have been used to detect these agents, bacterial culture is considered the gold standard method for identifying mastitis-causing microorganisms. However, conventional culture is slow, requiring 24–48 h, and needs labour intensive study for definitive identification (7, 8). Therefore, it is of commercial interest to accelerate this procedure by investigating alternative rapid DNA-based methods. PCR methods for detecting S. aureus in milk samples to identify cow mastitis have been proposed (9, 10, 11). However, PCR analyses from direct clinical material can result in false negative results caused by inhibitors in the clinical specimens (12, 13). Therefore the use of internal amplification controls with different strategies is recommended to determine false negative results of PCR analyses from direct clinical material or food samples (14, 15).

The aim of the present study was to develop PCR analyses with internal amplification control to detect S. aureus. A specific primer set for S. aureus was used and combined with bovine-specific primers.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Samples and Primers

Total of 50 milk samples from subclinical bovine mastitis were obtained from cattle farms in the Hatay region (The clinical samples were taken with permission with MKÜ Local Ethics committee; Meeting Date 17.06.2010: Meeting No: 2010/02: Decision No: 30) and nucleic acids were extracted from milk samples using the phenol–chloroform method. Extracted DNA was stored at ­-20°C (16).

Primers for S. aureus (Sau 327 and Sau 1645) and Bovine specific (12SM-FW and 12SBT-REV2) were used in this study. Simplex PCR protocols and procedures were carried out according to the recommendations in the literature for those primers. The properties of the primers used in this study are shown in Table 1.

Table 1. Properties of primers used in the study

thumb

Optimisation of internally controlled PCR mix

All procedures and protocols for multiplex PCR assays were optimized according to Henegariu et al., (18). The amplification mixture for multiplex PCR was carried out in a final volume of 25 µL. The mixture consisted of 200 ng of extracted DNA template, different amounts of 1.5U of TaqDNA polymerase (Vivantis Technologies), 2 µL of 10x PCR buffer (10X ViBuffer A without MgCl2), 3 mM MgCl2, 200 µM each of dNTPs (Vivantis Technologies), 20 pmol of primer pair (Sau 327 and Sau 1645) specific for S. aureus, and 5 pmol primers (12SM-FW and 12SBT-REV2) specific for bovine gene.

Amplification was carried out after an initial denaturation at 95°C for 3 min. The PCR protocol was: 60 s of template denaturation at 94°C, 60 s of different primer annealing temperatures at 54°C, and 90 s of primer extension at 72°C (total of 35 cycles), with a final extension at 72°C for 5 min. The amplified PCR products were electrophoresed in 1.5% agarose gel and stained with ethidium bromide (0.5 mg/mL), and the DNA bands were visualised under UV light.

RESULTS

Simplex PCR reaction results

In the PCR analyses of milk samples, 3 of 50 samples were found to be S. aureus bysimplex PCR and the specific amplification products (1318 bp). They are shown in Figure 1. S. aureus– specific bands were amplified very effectively with simplex PCR.

thumb

Figure 1 Results of simplex PCR from milk samples with S. aureus specific primers. M: 100bp plus marker. Lanes 1, 2, and 4: S. aureus-specific bands with Sau 327 and Sau 1645 primers (1318 bp). Lane 5: Distilled Water (Negative Control)

Multiplex PCR reaction results

In the PCR analysis results, specific bands for bovine gene as an internal control and specific bands for S. aureus were amplified effectively in the same PCR mixture; the amplification products are shown in Figure 2.

thumb

Figure 2 Results of multiplex PCR from milk samples. M: 100bp plus marker. 1–4: bovine-specific bands with 12SM-FW and 12SBT-REV2 primers (346 bp); 1, 2, and 4: S. aureus–specific bands with Sau 327 and Sau 1645 primers (1318 bp); 5: Distilled Water (Negative Control)

DISCUSSION

Staphylococcus aureus is considered an important and common pathogen causing bovine mastitis that can also be dangerous to human health. There are some studies including PCR detection of S. aureus from bovine milk samples (9, 10, 11). However, in the PCR analyses from clinical material false negative results can be encountered due to inhibitory substances. In order to avoid these false negative results, using internal control was recommended (12, 13). Particularly, using of host specific internal control can be useful to determine false negative results due to mistakes in sampling, DNA extraction or preparing PCR mixtures and thermal cycler failures (14, 15, 19). Therefore, a PCR technique with host specific internal control was developed in this study by combining S. aureus specific primers and cow specific primers.

In this study a preliminary type, a specific primer set for S. aureus, was combined with specific bovine gene primers to develop an easy and rapid multiplex PCR system with high specificity. Using this optimised combination, a PCR analysis with an internal control specific for bovine genes was developed to detect S. aureus. The primer sets successfully amplified the target genes in the multiplex PCR without nonspecific or additional bands. There was no difficulty in discriminating between each band for the target strain (1318 bp) and the internal control (346 bp). Despite the low numbers of positive samples used in this study, the authors are confident that the developed technique will be reproducible in larger experiments.

At the end of the optimisation experiments, the best amplification results were obtained by decreasing 10x PCR buffer (2 µL) and host-specific primers 12SM-FW and 12SBT-REV2 (internal control, 5 pmol) and increasing to 20 pmol primers (Sau 327 and Sau 1645) specific for S. aureus. While low and high concentrations of MgCl2 negatively affected the multiplex PCR, the best results were obtained with 3 mM of MgCl2 concentration. The other important parameter was the annealing temperature: the best results were obtained at 54°C. The effects of these parameters were found to be in agreement with the recommendations of Henegariu et al. (18) and Phuektes et al. (20).

Despite the small number of samples analysed, the results of this preliminary study showed that this method can be used as a reliable and effective method for the diagnosis of S. aureus in the individual bovine milk or bulk milk samples. This technique should be tried for S. aureus detection from bovine milk products

In conclusion, conventional PCR has already become widespread and is less expensive than other molecular techniques. The developed technique in this study might have the potential to detect S. aureus from bovine clinical samples. This method can be used for detecting S. aureus in the bovine milk or milk products. The technique can also be extended to detect other contagious mastitis pathogens, such as Streptococcus agalactiae and Trueperella pyogenes.


References

1. Sommerhäuser J, Kloppert B, Wolter W, Zschöck M, Sobiraj A, Failing K, The epidemiology of Staphylococcus aureus infections from subclinical mastitis in dairy cows during a control programmeVet Microbiol 2003; 96: 91-102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1135(03)00204-9.
2. Le Marechal C, Thiery R, Leloir Y, Mastitis impact on technologic properties of milk and quality of milk products- reviewDairy Sci Technol 2011; 91: 247-282.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13594-011-0009-6.
3. Halasa T, Nielen M, De Roos A.P, Van Hoorne R, De Jong G, Lam T.J, Van Werven T, Hogeveen H, Production loss due to new subclinical mastitis in Dutch dairy cows estimated with a test-day modelJ Dairy Sci 2009; 92: 599-606. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2008-1564.
4. Belschner A.P, Hallberg J.W, Nickerson S.C, Owens W.E, Staphylococcus aureus mastitis therapy revisitedProceedings of the National Mastitis Council Annual Meeting 1996; Madison, Wisconsin: 116-122.
5. Taponen S, Simojoki H, Haveri M, Larsen H.D, Pyorala S, Clinical characteristics and persistence of bovine mastitis caused by different species of coagulase-negative staphylococci identified with API or AFLPVet Microbiol 2006; 115: 199-207. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2006.02.001. PMid:16527434
6. Le Loir Y, Baron F, Gautier M, Staphylococcus aureus and food poisoningGenet Mol Res 2003; 2: 63-76.
7. NMC. Laboratory and field handbook on bovine mastitisNational Mastitis Council 1999; Madison, Wisconsin: 139-
8. Koivula M, Mäntysaari E.A, Pitkälä A, Pyörälä S, Distribution of bacteria and seasonal and regional effects in a new database for mastitis pathogens in FinlandActa Agric Scand. A 2007; 57: 89-96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09064700701488941.
9. Khan M.A, Kim C.H, Kakoma I, Morin E, Hansen R.D, Hurley W.L, Tripathy D.N, Baek B.K, Detection of Staphylococcus aureus in milk by use of polymerase chain reaction analysisAm J Vet Res 1998; 59: 807-813.
10. Riffon R, Sayasith K, Khalil H, Dubreuil P, Drolet M, Lagace A, Development of a rapid and sensitive test for identification of major pathogens in bovine mastitis by PCRJ Clin Microbiol 2001; 39: 2584-2589. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JCM.39.7.2584-2589.2001. PMid:11427573;PMCid:PMC88189
11. Ahmadi M, Rohani S.M.R, Ayremlou N, Detection of Staphylococcus aureus in milk by PCRComp Clin Pathol 2010; 19: 91-94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00580-009-0901-0.
12. Wilson I.G, Cooper J.E, Gilmour A, Some factors inhibiting amplification of the Staphylococcus aureus enterotoxin c1 gene (sec+) by PCRInt J Food Microbiol 1994; 22: 55-62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0168-1605(94)90007-8.
13. Kim C.H, Khan M.A, Morin E, Hurley W.L, Tripathy D.N, Kehrli M, JrOlouch A.O, Kakomal I, Optimization of the PCR for detection of Staphylococcus aureus nuc gene in bovine milkJ Dairy Sci 2001; 84: 74-83. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(01)74454-2.
14. Hoorfar J, Malorny B, Abdulmawjood A, Cook N, Wagner M, Fach P, Practical considerations in design of internal amplification controls for diagnostic PCR assaysJ Clin Microbiol 2004; 42: 51863-1868. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JCM.42.5.1863-1868.2004.
15. He X, Shi X, Internal amplification control and its applications in PCR detection of foodborne pathogensWei Sheng Wu Xue Bao 2010; 50: 2141-147.
16. Sambrook J, Russell W, Molecular cloning:a laboratory manual 2001; A8.9-A8.10: 3rd ed. New York: Cold Spring Harbor Press; 2049-2050.
17. Lopez-Calleja A.I, Fajardo I.G, Rodriguez V, Hernandez M.A, Garcia P.E, Martin R, PCR detection of cows’ milk in water buffalo milk and mozzarella cheeseInt Dairy J 2005; 15: 1122-1129. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.idairyj.2004.12.003.
18. Henegariu O.N, Heerema A, Dlouhy S.R, Vance G.H, Vogt P.H, Multiplex PCR-critical parameters and step-by-step protocolBiotechniques 1997; 23: 504-511.
19. Helps C, Reeves N, Egan K, Howard P, Harbour D, Detection of Chlamydophila felis and feline herpes virus by multiplex real-time PCR analysisJ Clin Microbiol 2003; 6: 2734-2736. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JCM.41.6.2734-2736.2003.
20. Phuektes P, Mansell P.D, Browning G.F, Multiplex polymerase chain reaction assay for simultaneous detection of Staphylococcus aureus and streptococcal causes of bovine mastitisJ Dairy Sci 2001; 84: 1140-1148. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(01)74574-2.


Copyright

© 2015 Cantekin Z. This is an open-access article published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declared that they have no potential conflict of interest with respect to the authorship and/or publication of this article.

Citation Information

Macedonian Veterinary Review. Volume 38, Issue 1, Pages 97-100, p-ISSN 1409-7621, e-ISSN 1857-7415, DOI: 10.14432/j.macvetrev.2015.01.038, 2015