Original Scientific Article
Relation between microclimate and air quality in the extensively reared turkey house
Mario Ostović * ,
Sven Menčik ,
Ivica Ravić ,
Slavko Žužul ,
Željko Pavičić ,
Kristina Matković ,
Boris Antunović ,
Danijela Horvatek Tomić ,
Anamaria Ekert Kabalin

Mac Vet Rev 2017; 40 (1): 83 - 90

10.1515/macvetrev-2017-0015

Received: 23 November 2016

Received in revised form: 02 February 2017

Accepted: 14 February 2017

Available Online First: 18 February 2017

Published on: 15 March 2017

Correspondence: Mario Ostović, mostovic@vef.hr
PDF

Abstract

od air quality in poultry houses is crucial for animal health and productivity. In these houses, air is generally contaminated with noxious gases and microorganisms, the concentrations of which depend on numerous factors including microclimate. In this case study, the relation between microclimate and air concentrations of noxious gases and microorganisms was investigated in extensively reared turkey house. The study was carried out at a family household in Dalmatia hinterland, Croatia, with 50.3±3.1 turkeys kept in the house during the study period. Air temperature, relative humidity, airflow rate, concentrations of ammonia, carbon dioxide, bacteria and fungi in indoor air were measured three times per month from September to December, in the morning, prior to releasing turkeys out for grazing. Air temperature ranged from 9.73 to 26.98 °C, relative humidity from 63.29% to 75.08%, and airflow rate from 0.11 to 0.17 m/s. Lowest ammonia and carbon dioxide concentrations were measured in September (2.17 ppm and 550 ppm, respectively) and highest in December (4.50 ppm and 900 ppm, respectively). Bacterial and fungal counts were lowest in December (2.51x105 CFU/m3 and 3.27x103 CFU/m3 air, respectively) and highest in September (6.85x105 CFU/m3 and 1.06x105 CFU/m3 air, respectively). Air temperature and relative humidity showed negative correlation with concentrations of noxious gases and positive correlation with air microorganisms (P<0.05 all).

Keywords: turkeys, ammonia, carbon dioxide, bacteria, fungi

INTRODUCTION

“Dalmatian turkey” has been traditionally grown at numerous households in Dalmatia hinterland, Croatia, as an indigenous type of poultry important for local community. Extensive fattening of this turkey is of seasonal type as fattened turkeys are generally sold during late autumn and winter, mostly as a Christmas season speciality (1, 2). As stated by Ekert Kabalin et al. (3), the specific rearing type is one of the reasons for the characteristic flavour and high value of the “Dalmatian turkey” meat. These turkeys are kept free range, where they are grazing, and proteins, minerals and vitamins are supplemented in their feed according to the needs of the species and production category. This type of turkey rearing reduces feeding costs and consequently the costs of overall turkey meat production, while simultaneously favouring their well-being. The houses where turkeys are kept during the warm phase of breeding (approximately the first two months of life) and at night are simple, frequently improvised shelters or some old premises redesigned to turkey shelters.

Good air quality in poultry houses is essential for animal health and productivity, as well as for farmer health and nearby environment (4, 5). The air in these settings is frequently contaminated with various pollutants such as noxious gases and microorganisms. Ammonia is a noxious gas generated by bacterial breakdown of organic nitrogen compounds in manure (6). Carbon dioxide is produced by fuel combustion and bird breathing as a metabolic end-product (7) and is considered as sanitary indicator of indoor air quality. It is also released from the manure (8). Considering microorganisms, saprophytic bacteria prevail in poultry houses; however, the presence of pathogenic bacteria, fungi, spores and other microorganisms has also been reported. Nearly 80% of microorganisms present in the air of poultry houses originate from the animals accommodated there (9-11). Air concentrations of microorganisms and noxious gases depend, among others, on bird age, type of housing system and stocking density, manure management, efficiency of ventilation, and microclimate that is primarily determined by air temperature, relative humidity and airflow rate. The concentrations of these pollutants have been increasingly investigated in intensive poultry production (12-15).

In the present case study, the relation between microclimate (air temperature, relative humidity and airflow rate) and air concentrations of noxious gases (ammonia and carbon dioxide) and microorganisms (bacteria and fungi) in the house for extensively reared turkeys in Dalmatia was assessed.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study was carried out in a turkey house at a family household in Dalmatia hinterland, Croatia, during the final period of turkey extensive fattening, from September (the end of summer and the beginning of autumn) to December 2014 (the end of autumn and the beginning of winter). Dalmatia belongs to the Mediterranean climate region characterized by hot and dry summer and mild and wet winter.

All study turkeys had been hatched in spring. The house is a stone building redesigned for turkey house accommodating 50.3±3.1 turkeys. The house dimensions are 2.9 m L x 4.2 m W x 2.3 m H, with concrete floor, wooden door (0.8 m W x 2.0 m H) and perches for turkeys. Lighting is natural through window sized 1.5 m W x 1.0 m H. The house was regularly cleaned once a week. During the day, turkeys were grazing free range and supplemented with corn twice a day (in the morning and in the evening) from plastic dishes outside the house. Turkeys had access to tap water ad libitum from improvised dishes indoor and outside the house.

Microclimate parameters, noxious gas concentrations and microbiological contamination of indoor air were measured three times per month, every tenth day, in the morning, prior to releasing turkeys out for grazing. Air temperature (°C), relative humidity (%), airflow rate (m/s), and ammonia (ppm) and carbon dioxide (ppm) concentrations were measured by portable devices (Testo and Dräger, Germany). Air was sampled by use of the SAS 100™ device (PBI International, Italy). Air samples were cultured into Petri dishes with nutrient medium for determination of total count of mesophilic bacteria (Nutrient agar, Biolife, Italy) and fungi (Sabouraud maltose agar, Biolife, Italy), which were then incubated at 37 °C for 24 h for mesophilic bacteria and at 22 °C for 5 days for fungi, as previously described (16, 17). The grown colonies were expressed as number of colony-forming units per m3 air (CFU/m3), with results corrected as per table and equation supplied with the device. On each occasion, all study parameters were measured at the same five sites in the house (in the centre and corners), in turkey biozone, in order to obtain average representative values. Throughout the study period, outdoor air temperature and relative humidity were measured at the same two sites, in front of and behind the house.

The data collected were analysed using the Statistica v. 12.5 (StatSoft Inc., 2014) software. Basic data processing was done by use of descriptive statistics methods. Because of the limited number of measurements per month, differences in study parameters according to months were tested by non-parametric test, Friedman analysis of variance, while Spearman rank order correlation was employed to determine correlations among the parameters.

RESULTS

The highest values of air temperature (26.98 °C) and relative humidity (75.08%) in turkey house were recorded in September, differing significantly (P<0.05) from the lowest values recorded in December (9.73 °C and 63.29%, respectively). Airflow rate was highest in December (0.17 m/s) and lowest in September (0.11 m/s), with no significant differences throughout the study period. Indoor air concentrations of ammonia and carbon dioxide were highest in December (4.50 ppm and 900 ppm, respectively) and lowest in September (2.17 ppm and 550 ppm, respectively), with a significant difference (P<0.05 both) between the months (Table 1).

Table 1. Microclimate parameters and noxious gas air concentrations in turkey house during final period of extensive fattening

thumb

Total bacterial count in indoor air ranged from 2.51x105 CFU/m3 (December) to 6.85x105 CFU/m3 (September) and total fungal count ranged from 3.27x103 CFU/m3 (December) to 1.06x105 CFU/m3 (September), with significantly lower concentrations (P<0.05 both) recorded in December as compared with September (Fig. 1 and 2).

thumb

Figure 1. Total bacterial count in the air of turkey house during final period of extensive fattening n=3 measurements per month at five sites in the house;

avalues marked by the same letter differed statistically significantly at the level of P<0.05

thumb

Figure 2. Total fungal count in the air of turkey house during final period of extensive fattening n=3 measurements per month at five sites in the house;

avalues marked by the same letter differed statistically significantly at the level of P<0.05

The highest value of outdoor air temperature (27.37 °C) was recorded in September, differing significantly (P<0.05) from the lowest value recorded in December (3.86 °C), while the highest value of relative humidity outside the house was found in December (72.07%) and lowest in October (59.39%); yet, there were no significant differences between the months.

Air temperature and relative humidity inside the house showed negative correlation with ammonia and carbon dioxide concentrations and positive correlation with bacterial and fungal counts in indoor air (P<0.05 all). There were no significant correlations between airflow rate and other parameters observed. Positive correlation was found between ammonia and carbon dioxide concentrations, as well as between bacterial and fungal count in the air (P<0.05 all). Bacterial and fungal count showed negative correlation with ammonia and carbon dioxide concentrations in the air (P<0.05 all) (Table 2). Outdoor air temperature showed positive correlation with indoor air temperature (P<0.05), thus both showing comparable correlations with other parameters observed. Outdoor relative humidity showed no significant correlation with other parameters observed.

Table 2. Spearman rank order correlation among study parameters

thumb

DISCUSSION

Intensive turkey fattening implies rearing in confined houses with full feeding and microclimate control. In this type of rearing, optimal indoor air temperature after the warm phase of turkey production is 18-20 °C, relative humidity 60%-75%, and airflow rate 0.1-0.25 m/s. Fattening generally takes 13-16 weeks, when turkeys gain body mass of 6-9 kg. In case of sex specific fattening, female turkeys gain body mass of 5-8 kg in a period of 14-16 weeks, whereas male turkeys gain body mass of 14-16 kg in the period of 20-22 weeks. In case of extensive rearing, fattening generally takes longer period of 24-32 weeks, when turkeys weigh 5-8 kg. Extensive fattening is characterized by keeping turkeys in controlled conditions during the warm phase of rearing, followed by free range keeping till day 150 on average, with supplementary feeding with concentrated feed, and turkey fattening in the house for additional 60 days (18, 19).

The present study included turkeys on extensive fattening, i.e. after the warm phase of rearing they were kept free range throughout the period of fattening whenever possible by weather conditions, and kept indoor at night. The study was performed in the final period of fattening (September-December), with the values of microclimate parameters being within the range recommended for intensive turkey fattening throughout the study, except for air temperature (Table 1).

Tolerance to ammonia is considerably lower in poultry as compared with other animal species. Ammonia concentration of 20 ppm will cause eye and airway irritation in poultry, resulting in impaired feeding, lower weight gain and larger susceptibility to viral infections, thus being considered a critical level of ammonia (20, 21). Carbon dioxide is present in the atmosphere at a concentration of 300-400 ppm, with 3000 ppm as the maximal allowed level in the air of poultry house (11, 22). Higher air concentrations of carbon dioxide will cause circulatory derangements and appetite reduction. Increased air concentration of carbon dioxide is as a rule accompanied by higher ammonia concentration (19), as also confirmed in the present study (Table 2), where the measured concentrations of both gases were several times lower than their critical values for poultry throughout the study period (Table 1).

Generating high ammonia and carbon dioxide concentrations in the air of poultry houses has been associated with higher indoor air temperature, due to higher microbial activity in the manure during warm weather (23, 24). However, in intensive production, their concentrations generally are highest during winter due to reduced ventilation, i.e. lower airflow rate, in order to minimize heat loss (25-27). As reported by Zhao et al. (28), higher ventilation rate associated with warmer indoor air leads to higher rate of manure drying out and thus to lower ammonia production. In cold weather, less intensive ventilation and humid air result in higher manure humidity, which favours microbiological decomposition of uric acid to ammonia.

In our study, the levels of ammonia and carbon dioxide in indoor air were also higher in cold season (Table 1), but there was no significant correlation between ammonia/carbon dioxide concentrations and airflow rate, i.e. airflow was stable during the observed period. In addition, noxious gas concentrations showed negative correlation with microorganism count in the air, air temperature and relative humidity (Table 2). Therefore, the higher concentrations of these gases in the indoor air during cold weather, i.e. at the end of fattening period, could be attributed to the growth and greater body mass of turkeys, as supported by Miles et al. (29). An additional explanation of the increased ammonia and carbon dioxide concentrations in indoor air during cold season may be found in the fact that turkeys probably stayed longer in the house due to shorter daylight and considerably lower outdoor air temperature.

Comparative studies of air quality in the houses of various farm animals have revealed the highest levels of microorganisms just in the air of poultry houses (30-32), with bacterial count in the air of house accommodating turkeys reared in intensive systems reaching up to 108 CFU/m3 and fungal count 104 CFU/m3 (33). The bacterial and fungal air concentrations measured in the present study were within these limits, with significantly lower values recorded in December as compared with September, i.e. during lower air temperatures (Fig. 1 and 2).

avalues marked by the same letter differed statistically significantly at the level of P<0.05The microorganism counts, just like noxious gas concentrations, in the air of houses of intensively reared poultry generally are higher in cold months as compared with summer months, which is attributed to the lower airflow rate in the houses during cold season, as discussed by Matković et al. (17). In the present study, there was no significant correlation between bacterial/fungal count in the air and airflow rate. However, significant positive correlation was found between microorganism count and air temperature/relative humidity (Table 2). Air concentrations of the bacteria and fungi were lower during cold period, which can be explained by the fact that the microorganisms requiring temperature >20 °C for their growth and development were determined in this study. Investigating microbiological air contamination in poultry houses in summer and winter, Wójcik et al. (16) found higher bacterial and fungal counts during cold season; however, the lowest microorganism count in winter was recorded in a house with lowest air humidity and highest air velocity, which is consistent with the present study. Popescu et al. (34) also found positive correlation between bacterial and fungal count in the air of poultry house and relative humidity; as explained by the authors, the bacteria require humidity to stay viable and be air-borne, while the 50%-70% level of humidity is optimal for their destruction. Yet, there seems to be no clear consensus on the impact of humidity on the survival of bacteria and fungi in the air (35).

CONCLUSION

The present case study investigated microclimate conditions, air temperature, relative humidity and airflow rate in the house of turkeys on extensive fattening, and their relation with the concentrations of ammonia, carbon dioxide, bacteria and fungi in indoor air. Study results revealed higher concentrations of noxious gases and lower microorganism count in the indoor air during cold season and at lower air humidity, and vice versa.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

The authors declared that they have no potential conflict of interest with respect to the authorship and/or publication of this article.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

The study was carried out within the frame of the Dalmatian Turkey - Phenotypic Parameters and Ecological Characteristics of the Area project supported by the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Rural Development, the State Institute for Nature Protection and the National Park Krka, Croatia.


References

1. Ekert Kabalin A, Menčik S, Ostović M, Štoković I, Grgas A, Horvath Š, Balenović T, Sušić V, Karadjole I, Pavičić Ž, Morphological characteristics of Dalmatian turkey: preliminary resultsMaced J Anim Sci 2012; 2: 277-280.

2. Maurić M, Starčević K, Menčik S, Ostović M, Ekert Kabalin A, Influence of meat type, sex and storage time on fatty acid profile of free range Dalmatian turkeyMac Vet Rev 2016; 39: 167-174. https://doi.org/10.1515/macvetrev-2016-0081

3. Ekert Kabalin A, Menčik S, Ostović M, Kabalin H, Balenović M, Balenović T, Štoković I, Sušić V, Starčević K, Maurić M, Tissue share in the breast, thighs and drumsticks of turkeys from Dalmatian hinterlandStočarstvo 2013; 67: 9-16.in Croatian

4. Cargill C, Murphy T, Banhazi T, Hygiene and air quality in intensive housing facilities in AustraliaAnim Prod Aust 2002; 24: 387-393.

5. Dalólio FS, da Silva JN, Albino LFT, Moreira J, Mendes LB, Air pollution and their mitigation measures in Brazilian poultry productionAfr J Agric Res 2015; 10: 4522-4531.
https://doi.org/10.5897/AJAR2015.10356

6. Ritz CW, Fairchild BD, Lacy MP, Implications of ammonia production and emissions from commercial poultry facilities: A reviewJ Appl Poult Res 2004; 13: 684-692.
https://doi.org/10.1093/japr/13.4.684

7. Olanrewaju HA, Dozier WA, Purswell JL, Branton SL, Miles DM, Lott BD, Pescatore AJ, Thaxton JP, Growth performance and physiological variables for broiler chickens subjected to short-term elevated carbon dioxide concentrationsInt J Poult Sci 2008; 7: 738-742.https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2008.738.742

8. Ni J.-Q, Heber AJ, Hanni SM, Lim TT, Diehl CA, Characteristics of ammonia and carbon dioxide releases from layer hen manureBr Poult Sci 2010; 51: 326-334.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2010.495977 PMid:20680867

9. Matković K, Vučemilo M, Vinković B, Dust and endotoxin in laying hen dwellingsTurk. J. Vet. Anim. Sci 2012; 36: 189-195.

10. Zhao Y, Aarnink AJA, de Jong MCM, Groot Koerkamp PWG, Airborne microorganisms from livestock production systems and their relation to dustCrit Rev Env Sci Tec 2014; 44: 1071-1128. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2012.746064

11. Skóra J, Matusiak K, Wojewódzki P, Nowak A, Sulyok M, Ligocka A, Okrasa M, Hermann J, Gutarowska B, Evaluation of microbiological and chemical contaminants in poultry farmsInt J Environ Res Public Health 2016; 13: 192-207. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13020192 PMid:26861361PMCid: PMC4772212

12. Vučemilo M, Matković K, Vinković B, Jakšić S, Granić K, Mas N, The effect of animal age on air pollutant concentration in a broiler houseCzech J Anim Sci 2007; 52: 170-174.

13. Knížatová M, Mihina Š, Brouček J, Karandušovská I, Sauter GJ, Mačuhová J, Effect of the age and season of fattening period on carbon dioxide emissions from broiler housingCzech J Anim Sci 2010; 55: 436-444.

14. Bródka K, Kozajda A, Buczyńska A, Szadkowska-Stańczyk I, The variability of bacterial aerosol in poultry houses depending on selected factorsInt J Occup Med Environ Health 2012; 25: 281-293. https://doi.org/10.2478/s13382-012-0032-8PMid:22729495

15. Prodanov M, Radeski M, Ilieski V, Air quality measurements in laying hens housingMac Vet Rev 2016; 39: 91-95. https://doi.org/10.1515/macvetrev-2016-0071

16. Wójcik A, Chorąży L, Mituniewicz T, Witkowska D, Iwańczuk-Czernik K, Sowińska J, Microbial air contamination in poultry houses in the summer and winterPolish J Environ Stud 2010; 19: 1045-1050.

17. Matković K, Vučemilo M, Štoković I, Šimić R, Marušić D, Vinković B, Matković S, Concentrations of airborne bacteria and fungi in a livestock building with caged laying hensVet arhiv 2013; 83: 413-424.

18. Pavičić Ž, Ostović M, Turkey breedingHrvat vet vjesn 2007; 30: 185-194.in Croatian

19. Vučemilo M, Hygiene and bioecology in poultry farming 2008; Zagreb: Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Zagreb. (in Croatian);

20. Osorio JA, Tinoco IF, Ciro HJ, Ammonia: A review of concentration and emission models in livestock structuresDyna 2009; 76: 89-99.

21. Glatz P, Rodda B, Turkey farming: Welfare and husbandry issuesAfr J Agric Res 2013; 8: 6149-6163.

22. Knížatová M, Brouček J, Mihina Š, Seasonal differences in levels of carbon dioxide and ammonia in broiler housingSlovak J Anim Sci 2010; 43: 105-112.

23. Kilic I, Yaslioglu E, Ammonia and carbon dioxide concentrations in a layer houseAsian Australas J Anim Sci 2014; 27: 1211-1218.
https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2014.14099 PMid:25083117PMCid: PMC4109879

24. Nimmermark S, Gustafsson G, Influence of temperature, humidity and ventilation rate on the release of odour and ammonia in a floor housing system for laying hensAgric Eng Int: CIGR J Sci Res Dev 2005; 7: Manuscript BC 04 008PMid:16259426

25. Carr LE, Wheaton FW, Douglass LW, Empirical models to determine ammonia concentrations from broiler chicken litterT ASAE 1990; 33: 1337-1342.
https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.31478

26. Brouček J, Čermak B, Emission of harmful gases from poultry farms and possibilities of their reductionEkol Bratislava 2015; 34: 89-100. https://doi.org/10.1515/eko-2015-0010

27. David B, Mejdell C, Michel V, Lund V, Moe RO, Air quality in alternative housing systems may have an impact on laying hen welfare. Part II – AmmoniaAnimals 2015; 5: 886-896. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani5030368

28. Zhao Y, Shepherd TA, Li H, Xin H, Environmental assessment of three egg production systems–Part I: Monitoring system and indoor air qualityPoult Sci 2015; 94: 518-533. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/peu076PMid:25737567 PMCid: PMC4990888

29. Miles DM, Owens PR, Rowe DE, Spatial variability of litter gaseous flux within a commercial broiler house: Ammonia, nitrous oxide, carbon dioxide, and methanePoult Sci 2006; 85: 167-172. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/85.2.167 PMid:16523609

30. Seedorf J, Hartung J, Schröder M, Linkert KH, Phillips VR, Holden MR, Sneath RW, Short JL, White RP, Pedersen S, Takai H, Johnsen JO, Metz JHM, Groot Koerkamp PWG, Uenk GH, Wathes CM, Concentrations and emissions of airborne endotoxins and microorganisms in livestock buildings in northern EuropeJ Agric Engng Res 1998; 70: 97-109.
https://doi.org/10.1006/jaer.1997.0281

31. Radon K, Danuser B, Iversen M, Monso E, Weber C, Hartung J, Donham K, Palmgren U, Nowak D, Air contaminants in different European farming environmentsAnn Agric Environ Med 2002; 9: 41-48.PMid:12088396

32. Matković K, Vučemilo M, Vinković B, Airborne fungi in dwellings for dairy cows and laying hensArh Hig Rada Toksikol 2009; 60: 395-399.
https://doi.org/10.2478/10004-1254-60-2009-1970 PMid:20061239

33. Debey MC, Trampel DW, Richard JL, Bundy DS, Hoffman LJ, Meyer VM, Cox DF, Effect of environmental variables in turkey confinement houses on airborne Aspergillus and mycoflora compositionPoult Sci 1995; 74: 463-471. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0740463 PMid:7761330

34. Popescu S, Borda C, Diugan E, Microbiological air contamination in different types of housing systems for laying hensPro Environment 2013; 6: 549-555.

35. Tang JW, The effect of environmental parameters on the survival of airborne infectious agentsJ. R. Soc. Interface 2009; 6: S737-S746. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2009.0227.focus


Copyright

© 2017 Ostović M. This is an open-access article publishedunder the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License whichpermits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium,provided the original author and source are credited.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declared that they have no potential conflict of interest with respect to the authorship and/or publication of this article.

Citation Information

Macedonian Veterinary Review. Volume 40, Issue 1, Pages 83-90, p-ISSN 1409-7621, e-ISSN 1857-7415, DOI: 10.1515/macvetrev-2017-0015, 2017