Original Scientific Article
Induction and formation of accessory corpus luteum after artificial insemination (AI) might increase pregnancy rate per AI in heat stressed dairy cows
Boris Stojanov,
Branko Atanasov,
Juraj Grizelj,
Silvio Vince,
Martin Nikolovski,
Miroslav Kjosevski,
Toni Dovenski*,
Nikola Adamov,
Ksenija Ilievska,
Marko Samardzija

Mac Vet Rev 2020; 43 (1): 37 - 43


Received: 10 October 2019

Received in revised form: 10 January 2020

Accepted: 19 January 2020

Available Online First: 06 February 2020

Published on: 15 March 2020

Correspondence: Toni Dovenski, dovenski@fvm.ukim.edu.mk


The present study aimed to evaluate whether the induction and the formation of an accessory corpus luteum (CL) after AI might increase the pregnancy per AI (P/AI) in heat stressed dairy cows. Starting at d 50±3 post-partum, 113 lactating Holstein cows from one commercial herd during summer were scored for body condition, blood sampled and examined by ultrasound. Those bearing a CL>25mm and progesterone (P4) level>2ng/mL were synchronized using a double PGF2α injection given 12 h apart and AI-ed at detected estrus. In total 18 cows, there were not any signs of estrus (n=10) nor a P4 level <2ng/mL at the time of enrolment (n=8) and therefore they were excluded from the study, leading to 95 cows finally enrolled.. At d5 post-AI, cows were randomly allocated into 2 groups: control group (CON, n=45) without any additional treatment, and treatment group (GnRH, n=50), treated with 0.008 mg Buserelin – a GnRH agonist. Blood sampling and ultrasound examination were done at d5, d14 and at d21 after AI, whereas the pregnancy diagnosis was done at d21 and d30 after AI. Average daily temperature and relative humidity values were used to calculate the temperature-humidity index (THI). The average THI during the experiment was 79.5±0.6. At d5, no differences were observed neither between the number of the CL nor between the P4 level in both groups. At d14 and d21, 82% of the GnRH-treated cows had more than one CL versus 0% of the CON cows. Both at d14 and 21, GnRH-treated cows had higher P4 levels compared to the CON cows (p<0.05). In addition, P/AI were higher in the GnRH group than in the CON group (65% vs. 48.3%, p<0.05), whereas late embryonic losses were higher in CON in comparison to GnRH cows (10.6 vs. 4%, respectively). The BCS at the moment of insemination did not affect P/AI (p>0.05). In conclusion, the induction of an accessory CL at d 5 after AI might increase P/AI in heat stressed dairy cows.

Keywords: CL, AI, pregnancy rate, heat stress, cow


Heat stress adversely affects fertility of dairy cattle and compromises the reproductive function of the lactating dairy cows. Reduced expression of estrus (1), disruption of follicular and oocyte function (2), increased embryonic mortality (3) and reduced P4 concentration (4) are the key events associated with reduced reproductive functions during heat stress. Indeed, one often observed characteristic of cows chronically exposed to heat stress is a reduction of the circulating P4 concentration (4). Because P4 is an essential hormone for pregnancy maintenance, its reduction leads to decreased fertility. Therefore, many researchers have been focusing on identifying hormonal treatments that increase the P4 level in heat stressed cows. The main focus has been put on P4-releasing intra- vaginal devices (PRID) or controlled internal drug releases (CIDR) and on the ovulation-inducing products such as gonadotropin releasing hormone GnRH or human chorionic gonadotropin – hCG, (through induction of ovulation and formation of an accessory CL in cows bearing a CL). In this respect, an injection of hCG on d 5 of the estrous cycle did not improve the proportion of heat stressed cows to become pregnant after AI (5, 6) whilst Beltran and Vasconcelos (7) reported a significant improvement in fertility. Similarly, treatment with GnRH at AI in cows exposed to heat stress conditions did not affect the P/AI (8), whereas treatment with GnRH at AI and at AI and 12 days later, improved fertility compared to non-treated controls (30.8%, 35.4%, and 20.6%, respectively) (9). In addition, treatment with GnRH on d 5 after AI increases P/AI, but this effect was only observed in third lactating dairy cows (8), whereas injection of GnRH at days 14 – 15 after estrus to delay luteolysis did not generally affect fertility (10). Friedman et al. (11) showed, although not significantly, that CIDR treatment increases the conception rates by 6%, however, the treatment significantly increased the conception rate in cows with low BCS after calving. Even though, treatments during heat stress may offer some promise to improve fertility, reported results are so far rather inconsistent.
We hypothesized that an early elevation of the P4 level after AI in heat stressed cows would result in an increased P/AI. Thus, the objective of the present study was to examine whether the induction and the formation of an accessory CL post-AI would increase the P4 level and consequently improve P/AI in dairy cows during heat stress conditions.


Animals and synchronization protocol

Lactating Holstein cows (n=113) from one commercial herd during the summer season (July- September 2018) were enrolled in the study. Cows were housed in free-stall barns equipped with fans, fed a totally mixed ration once daily to meet or exceed requirements for lactating cows and were milked twice daily with an average milk production of 7500 l for 305 days. At 50±3 days post-partum, all cows were examined by ultrasound and scored for body condition (BCS) on a scale from 1-5 (1-emaciate - 5-obese) (12). The cows that were bearing a CL larger than 25 mm and that had a P4 level > 2.0 ng/ml were further synchronized using a double PGF injection [(2 ml (0.5 mg cloprostenol), PGF Veyx Forte, Veyx-Pharma GmbH, Germany)] given 12 h apart and were AI-ed at detected estrus. Ten cows did not show behavioural estrus signs and therefore 2wα ere excluded from the study. In addition, 8 cows had a P4 level less than < 2 ng/mL, regardless of having a CL and were also excluded from the analysis leading to 95 cows at total enrolled in the study. Subsequently, at d 5 post-AI cows were randomly allocated into 2 groups: the control group (CON, n=45), without any additional treatment, and the treatment group (GnRH group, n=50), treated with 0.008 mg Buserelin – a GnRH agonist (Receptal, Animal Health Ltd, New Zealand). We hypothesized that treatment with GnRH at d 5 should induce ovulation of the first dominant follicle post-AI leading to formation of an accessory CL and consequently increase the P4 level post-AI. In addition, cows were further clustered according to their BCS (low, L= 2.25- 2.75, medium M=2.75-3.00 and high Hi = 3.00- 3.75), group (GnRH and CON) and pregnancy status (pregnant and non-pregnant) into 12 clusters and correlated with the P4 concentration at d 5 and d 14 after AI. Because clusters 2 and 9 covered only 4 cows [2 in each cluster, (BCS- L, CON, PREG- and BCS-L, GNRH, PREG-)], these clusters were excluded from the statistical analysis.

Ultrasonographic examination, blood collection, progesterone analysis and pregnancy diagnosis

Cows were examined by ultrasound on the day of first PGF2a injection, at d 5 and d 14 post-AI, for the presence of the CL/s (d 5) and for accessory CL (d 14) with a B-mode scanner Mindray DP 50, (Soma Technology Inc. USA), equipped with a 7.5 MHz linear rectal probe. Blood samples were obtained from the coccygeal vein into evacuated tubes (BD Vacutainer® Plymouth, UK) at first PGF2a injection, on d 5 and d 14 as well as at d 21 after AI. The samples were immediately refrigerated and transported in a portable refrigerator to the lab within 3 hours after collection. Tubes were centrifuged (3000 RPM x g for 15 min) and after serum extraction stored at -20°C until P4 analysis. The P4 analysis was done at the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine – Skopje, North Macedonia, using commercially available kits (HUMAN, Progesterone ELISA Test Germany) on an Immuno-scan BDLS reader. The intra- and inter-assay CV were 7.2 % and 8.6%. Pregnancy diagnosis was done at d 21. Day 21 after AI was chosen because, on that day, there is a high probability that the cows might be diagnosed non- pregnant (no CL and P4<0.5 ng/ml) (13). At d 21, a positive pregnancy outcome was predicted when one or more CL larger than 25 mm in diameter were observed on either ovary. The cows that had been diagnosed pregnant at d 21, their pregnancy was confirmed at d 30 after AI by ultrasonographically detecting an embryo with a visible heartbeat.

Temperature and relative humidity measurements

Average daily temperature and relative humidity values were obtained from a meteorological station located near the herd. The temperature- humidity index (THI) was calculated according to the following formula: THI = (1.8xT+32)–[(0.55- 0.0055xRH) x (1.8xT-26)], where, T=Temperature and RH=Relative Humidity (14).

Statistical analysis

Multifactorial ANOVA was performed to analyse significant differences in measured parameters (blood progesterone concentration) in respect to the considered factors (GnRH treatment, body condition score, pregnancy status, as well as presence of 2 CL). When null-hypothesis was rejected, Duncan multiple range test was used to identify significantly different comparisons. Measurements for P4 levels at 14th day were log10 transformed due to a high level of variation.


The average THI during the experiment was 79.5±0.6, showing that cows were under heat stress condition. Overall, at d 5, no differences were noticed in the number of CL present on the ovaries between both groups of cows. Similarly, the circulating P4 concentration at d 5 did not differ between the GnRH and the CON group (1.67±0.59 ng/ml and 1.54± 0.52 ng/ml, p>0.05), respectively. Treatment with GnRH at d 5 after AI, significantly increased the percentage of cows with 2xCL at d 14, with more cows having 2xCL in the GnRH group compared to the CON group (82% vs. 0%), respectively. Cows that ovulated after GnRH (2 CL at d 14) had significantly higher P4 concentrations at d 14 (5.87±2.04 ng/mL) in comparison to the CON cows (4.21±1.22 ng/mL) and the GnRH cows that did not ovulate (only 1 CL at d 14 - 3.21±1.12 ng/ mL). At d 21 (Fig. 1), a higher percentage of cows in the GnRH group was diagnosed pregnant compared to the CON group (65% vs. 48.3%, p<0.05). At d 30 (Fig. 2), however, the percentage of pregnant cows was reduced to 61% in the GnRH group and 37.7% in the CON group, but the difference in number of pregnant animals between the two groups still being significantly in favour of the GnRH treated cows. It was assumed that cows that were diagnosed pregnant at d 21 but non-pregnant at d 30, had experienced late embryonic mortality.

Figure 1. Percentage of pregnant cows at d 21. Cows were synchronized with PGF α and AI-ed at detected estrus. At d 5 after AI, cows were treated with 0.008 mg Buserelin – a GnRH agonist (GnRH group) while the remaining cows (CON group) were left untreated. Pregnancy diagnoses was done at d 21 and confirmed d 30 after A2 I
At d 5, cows from the cluster (BCS-H, CON, PREG-) had a significantly lower P4 concentration in comparison to cows from the cluster (BCS-M, GnRH, PREG +), cluster (BCS-L, GnRH, PREG +) as well as from the cluster (BCS-H, GnRH, PREG+). The remaining clusters did not differ among each other.

Figure 2. Percentage of cows with LEM. Cows were synchronized with PGF2α and AI-ed at detected estrus. At d5 after AI, cows were treated with 0.008 mg Buserelin – a GnRH agonist (GnRH group) while the remaining cows (CON group) were left untreated. Pregnancy diagnoses was done at d 21 and confirmed at d 30 after AI
At d 14, cows from the cluster (BCS-L, CON, PREG-) had significantly lower P4 concentration in comparison to cows from the cluster (BCS-M, GnRH, PREG +), cluster (BCS-L, GnRH, PREG -), cluster (BCS-L, GnRH, PREG+), as well as from the cluster (BCS-H, GnRH, PREG +). Similarly, cows from the cluster (BCS-H, CON, PREG -) had significantly lower P4 concentration compared to the cows from the clusters (BCS-M, GnRH, PREG +, BCS-L, GnRH, PREG -, BCS-L, GnRH, PREG+ and BCS-H, GnRH, PREG+). Interestingly, cows from the cluster BCS-H, CON, PREG + had similar P4 concentration at d 14 as all-remaining clusters in the GnRH group.


The present study aimed to assess whether the treatment with GnRH at d 5 after AI would increase P/AI as a consequence of the formation of an accessory CL and thus a greater P4 concentration post-AI during a heat stress condition in dairy cows. The results corroborate with our hypothesis because the treatment with GnRH at d 5 in heat stressed cows resulted in ovulation and formation of an accessory CL in comparison to the non- treated control group. Although, the ovulatory response to GnRH during heat stress is reported to be decreased due to a reduction in magnitude of the preovulatory surge in luteinizing hormone and estradiol (15, 16), surprisingly, the percentage of cows that ovulated after GnRH in our study was higher than mentioned in previous reports. The treatment with GnRH between d 4 and 9 after AI induced ovulation of the first dominant follicle in approximately 60% of the cows (17). One of the reasons for the higher ovulatory response could be the circulating P4 concentration at the moment of the GnRH injection. The circulating P4 concentrations are inversely related to the LH pulse frequency, thus an elevated P4 concentration decreases the LH pulse frequency and reduces the ovulatory response after GnRH induced ovulation and vice-versa. Therefore, ovulation and GnRH- induced LH release are suppressed in the presence of a CL and high concentrations of P4 in dairy cattle (18). Nevertheless, at d 5 after ovulation, the CL is still not fully developed (19), and the circulating P4 concentration is less than 2 ng/ml (20, 21) as shown in the current study, so, we are assuming that the GnRH treatment at that day resulted in anincreased ovulatory response.
Furthermore, the formation of an accessory CL in the GnRH group resulted in a greater P4 concentration at d 14 post-AI. The latter might be associated with the higher P/AI in the GnRH group and might have reduced both early and late embryonic mortality in comparison to the CON group. Indeed, our results correspond with the results reported by Larson et al. (22), where non-pregnant cows had lower P4 than pregnant cows. Nevertheless, other studies have shown no relationship between post-AI P4 concentrations and pregnancy outcomes (23). Although, the results in the literature are unequivocal, the exact mechanism by which the circulating P4 concentration post-AI impacts on fertility is still unclear. It is suggested that increased P4 during days 3 to 7 post AI induces adaptations in the uterus that increase embryo elongation by Day 14 (24). Other authors suggested that P4 might be acting directly on the embryo to improve embryo development (25). Regardless of the pathways involved, a consistent effect of increased P4 concentrations after AI is an increase in embryo length. Because the length of the embryo is directly related to its capacity to produce INF-t (26), we are assuming that an increased post AI P4 concentration improves the embryo’s ability to produce INF-t (26). The latter prevents luteolysis at that specific time post AI, which is necessary to maintain pregnancy. In fact, our results showed that cows with an increased post AI P4 concentration have reduced late embryonic mortality in comparison to cows with reduced post AI P4 concentration. García- Ispierto et al. (3) also observed similar results reporting an association between warm weather and increased pregnancy loss between days 35 – 45 and day 90 of gestation.
An interesting result of the current study was the relatively high percentage of cows (48.3%) diagnosed pregnant in the CON group under heat stress conditions. We are assuming that a possible explanation for the latter might be the elevated P4 concentration during the follicular growth before ovulation. Since we have only included cows that had a P4 level > 2.0 ng/ml at PGF, it is clear that all ovulatory follicles have grown under high P4 environment. Progesterone concentration during the growth of the ovulatory follicle has been shown to affect the follicular growth rate and oocyte maturation (21). Actually, it has been shown that increased P4 concentration during the growth of the ovulatory follicle increases fertility to the subsequent timed AI by more than 10% (27). Nevertheless, a higher percentage of cows from the CON group in the current study experienced a late embryonic mortality. We are speculating that sub-optimal progesterone concentrations during this period may probably compromise conceptus development. In this regard, P4 supplementation has the potential to reduce the incidence of pregnancy loss during this period (3). On the other hand, a reduced P4 concentration during follicular growth, before ovulation, might result in premature down regulation of P4 receptors in the endometrium and hastened increase in expression of estradiol receptors, predisposing cows to short luteal phases (28). Given the results of the current study, it is clear that the P4 concentrations before and after AI play an important role in terms of pregnancy rates in heat stressed cows.
It is also worth discussing the estrus expression during heat stress. It has been shown that heat stress decreases the expression and duration of estrus in dairy cattle (29). In the current study, however, from the total of 95 cows included in the study, only 10 cows or 10.52% did not show signs of estrus following a double prostaglandin injection. These results demonstrated that 90% of the cows did show signs of estrus behaviour during heat stress. These findings are in agreement with the results reported by Voelz et al. (30), where 89.3% of the cows were detected in estrus. Although, it has been suggested that luteolysis after PGF2a is less likely to occur during summer (31), we clearly demonstrated that estrus synchronization using a double PGF2a injection is highly efficient during heat stress conditions, at least in cows bearing an active corpus luteum.
When cows were clustered according to BCS, treatment group and pregnancy status, the results show that BCS was not significantly related to the P4 concentration post AI. Regardless of the BCS, pregnant cows had a higher P4 concentration at d 14 in comparison to non-pregnant cows. The latter signifies again the importance of an increased P4 concentration post AI necessary for reaching higher fertility. Indeed, our results demonstrated that cows should be in an optimal BCS and need an elevated P4 concentration before and after AI in order to become pregnant under heat stress condition.


Reaching a high fertility rate during the hot months of the year still represents a challenge for both veterinarians and farmers. Many attempts have been made to overcome this problem; however, the results are unequivocal. Injecting GnRH at d 5 after AI causes an increase in P4 level post AI through formation of an accessory corpus luteum. The latter increases post AI P4 level that might influence the conception rate and might increase P/AI and reduce the number of pregnancy losses. Therefore, in order to overcome lower P/AI during heat stress condition, we are suggesting treating the cows with GnRH at d 5 after AI.


The authors declared that they have no potential conflict of interest with respect to the authorship and/or publication of this article.


The authors are grateful to the staff of the dairy farm “ZK Pelagonija” for their cooperation in the preparation of this article.


  1. Thatcher, W.W., Collier, R.J. (1986). Effects of climate on bovine reproduction. In: D.A. Morrow (Ed.), Current therapy in theriogenology, 2nd ed., (pp. 301 - 309). Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders
  2. Rocha, A., Randel, R.D., Broussard, J.R., Lim, J.M., Blair, R.M., Roussel, J.D., Godke, R., Hansel, W. (1998). High environmental temperature and humidity decrease oocyte quality in Bos taurus but not in Bos taurus cows. Theriogenology 49(3): 657-665. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(98)00016-8
  3. García-Ispierto, I., López-Gatius, F., Santolaria, P., Yániz, J.L., Nogareda, C., López-Béjar, M., De Rensis, F. (2006). Relationship between heat stress during the peri-implantation period and early fetal loss in dairy cattle. Theriogenology 65(4): 799-807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2005.06.011 PMid:16085298
  4. Wolfenson, D., Roth, Z., Meidan, R. (2000). Impaired reproduction in heat-stressed cattle: basic and applied aspects. Anim Reprod Sci. 60, 535-547. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4320(00)00102-0
  5. Schmitt, E.P., Diaz, T., Barros, C.M., De La Sota, R.L., Drost, M., Fredriksson, E.W., et al. (1996). Differential response of the luteal phase and fertility in cattle following ovulation of the first-wave follicle with human chorionic gonadotropin or an agonist of gonadotropin-releasing hormone. J Anim Sci. 74(5): 1074-1083. https://doi.org/10.2527/1996.7451074x PMid:8726740
  6. Santos, J.E.P., Thatcher, W.W., Pool, L., Overton, M.W. (2001). Effect of human chorionic gonadotropin on luteal function and reproductive performance of high-producing lactating Holstein dairy cows. J Anim Sci. 79(11): 2881-2894. https://doi.org/10.2527/2001.79112881x PMid:11768118
  7. Beltran, M.P., Vasconcelos, J.L.M. (2008). Conception rate in Holstein cows treated with GnRH or hCG on the fifth day post artificial insemination during summer. Arq Bras Med Vet. 60(3): 580-586. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-09352008000300009
  8. Mendonça, L.G.D., Mantelo, F.M., Stevenson, J.S. (2017). Fertility of lactating dairy cows treated with gonadotropin-releasing hormone at AI, 5 days after AI, or both, during summer heat stress. Theriogenology 91, 9-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2016.11.032 PMid:28215691
  9. López-Gatius, F., Santolaria, P., Martino, A., Delétang, F., De Rensis, F. (2006). The effects of GnRH treatment at the time of AI and 12 days later on reproductive performance of high producing dairy cows during the warm season in northeastern Spain. Theriogenology 65(4): 820-830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2005.07.002 PMid:16112722
  10. Franco, M., Thompson, P.M., Brad, A.M., Hansen, P.J. (2006). Effectiveness of administration of gonadotropin-releasing hormone at Days 11, 14 or 15 after anticipated ovulation for increasing fertility of lactating dairy cows and non-lactating heifers. Theriogenology 66(4): 945-954. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2005.12.014 PMid:16580060 
  11. Friedman, E., Roth, Z., Voet, H., Lavon, Y., Wolfenson, D. (2012). Progesterone supplementation postinsemination improves fertility of cooled dairy cows during the summer. J Dairy Sci. 95(6), 3092-3099. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2011-5017 PMid:22612945
  12. Ferguson, J.D., Galligan, D.T., Thomsen, N. (1994). Principal descriptors of body condition score in Holstein cows. J Dairy Sci. 77(9): 2695-2703. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(94)77212-X
  13. Dovenski T., Atanasov, B., Ilievska, K., Stojanov, B., Jasari, B. (2016). Implementation of "on- farm" method for early detection of non- pregnant cows by a single ultrasonographic examination of the ovaries on day 21 after artificial insemination. Reproduction in Domestic Animals 51(S2), 73.
  14. Vitali, A., Segnalini, M., Bertocchi, L., Bernabucci, U., Nardone, A., Lacetera, N. (2009). Seasonal pattern of mortality and relationships between mortality and temperature-humidity index in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 92(8): 3781-3790. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2009-2127 PMid:19620660
  15. Gwazdauskas, F.C., Thatcher, W.W., Kiddy, C.A., Paape, M.J., Wilcox, C.J. (1981). Hormonal patterns during heat stress following PGF2α-tham salt induced luteal regression in heifers. Theriogenology 16(3): 271-285. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(81)90012-1
  16. Gilad, E., Meidan, R., Berman, A., Graber, Y., Wolfenson, D. (1993). Effect of heat stress on tonic and GnRH-induced gonadotrophin secretion in relation to concentration of oestradiol in plasma of cyclic cows. Reproduction 99(2): 315-321. https://doi.org/10.1530/jrf.0.0990315 PMid:8107012
  17. Stevenson, J.S., Portaluppi, M.A., Tenhouse, D.E., Lloyd, A., Eborn, D.R., Kacuba, S., DeJarnette, J.M. (2007). Interventions after artificial insemination: conception rates, pregnancy survival, and ovarian responses to gonadotropin-releasing hormone, human chorionic gonadotropin, and progesterone. J Dairy Sci. 90(1): 331-340. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(07)72634-6
  18. Stevenson, J.S., Pulley, S.L. (2012). Pregnancy per artificial insemination after presynchronizing estrous cycles with the Presynch-10 protocol or prostaglandin F2α injection followed by gonadotropin-releasing hormone before Ovsynch-56 in 4 dairy herds of lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 95(11): 6513-6522. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2012-5707 PMid:22939782
  19. Senger, P.L. (1997). Pathways to pregnancy and parturition. Current Conceptions, Inc., 1615 NE Eastgate Blvd.
  20. Dovenski, T., Kocoski, L., Trojacanec, P., Petkov, V., Popovski, K., Mickovski, G., Popovska-Percinic, F., Mickov, L. (1999). Comparison of ultrasonic morphology of bovine corpora lutea and plasma progesterone concentration during estrous cycle and early pregnancy. Mac. J. Reprod. 5, 47-57.
  21. Inskeep, E.K. (2004). Preovulatory, postovulatory, and postmaternal recognition effects of concentrations of progesterone on embryonic survival in the cow. Journal of Animal Science 82(S13), E24-E39. https://doi.org/10.2527/2004.8213_supplE24x PMid:15471804
  22. Larson, S.F., Butler, W.R., Currie, W.B. (1997). Reduced fertility associated with low progesterone postbreeding and increased milk urea nitrogen in lactating cows. J Dairy Sci. 80(7): 1288-1295. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(97)76058-2
  23. Stronge, A.J.H., Sreenan, J.M., Diskin, M.G., Mee, J.F., Kenny, D.A., Morris, D.G. (2005). Post-insemination milk progesterone concentration and embryo survival in dairy cows. Theriogenology 64(5): 1212-1224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2005.02.007 PMid:16125563
  24. Wiltbank, M.C., Souza, A.H., Carvalho, P.D., Cunha, A.P., Giordano, J.O., Fricke, P.M., Baez, G.M., Diskin, M.G. (2014). Physiological and practical effects of progesterone on reproduction in dairy cattle. Animal 8(S1), 70-81. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731114000585 PMid:24703103
  25. Clemente, M., de La Fuente, J., Fair, T., Al Naib, A., Gutierrez-Adan, A., Roche, J.F., Rizos, D., Lonergan, P. (2009). Progesterone and conceptus elongation in cattle: a direct effect on the embryo or an indirect effect via the endometrium? Reproduction 138(3): 507. https://doi.org/10.1530/REP-09-0152 PMid:19556439
  26. Bilby, T.R., Block, J., Do Amaral, B.C., Sa Filho, O., Silvestre, F.T., Hansen, P.J., Staples, C.R., Thatcher, W.W. (2006). Effects of dietary unsaturated fatty acids on oocyte quality and follicular development in lactating dairy cows in summer. J Dairy Sci. 89(10): 3891-3903. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72432-8
  27. Bisinotto, R.S., Chebel, R.C., Santos, J.E.P. (2010). Follicular wave of the ovulatory follicle and not cyclic status influences fertility of dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 93(8): 3578-3587. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2010-3047 PMid:20655426
  28. Silvia, W. J., Lewis, G. S., McCracken, J. A., Thatcher, W. W., Wilson Jr, L. (1991). Hormonal regulation of uterine secretion of prostaglandin F2α during luteolysis in ruminants. Biol Reprod. 45(5): 655-663. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod45.5.655 PMid:1756203
  29. Younas, M., Fuquay, J.W., Smith, A.E., Moore, A.B. (1993). Estrous and endocrine responses of lactating Holsteins to forced ventilation during summer. J Dairy Sci. 76(2): 430-436. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(93)77363-4
  30. Voelz, B.E., Rocha, L., Scortegagna, F., Stevenson, J.S., Mendonça, L.G.D. (2016). Treatment of lactating dairy cows with gonadotropin-releasing hormone before first insemination during summer heat stress. J Dairy Sci. 99(9): 7612-7623. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2016-10970 PMid:27289155
  31. Stevenson, J.S., Pulley, S.L., Mellieon Jr, H.I. (2012). Prostaglandin F2α and gonadotropin-releasing hormone administration improve progesterone status, luteal number, and proportion of ovular and anovular dairy cows with corpora lutea before a timed artificial insemination program. J Dairy Sci. 95(4): 1831-1844. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2011-4767 PMid:22459831


© 2020 Stojanov B. This is an open-access article published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Citation Information

Macedonian Veterinary Review. Volume 43, Issue 1, Pages 37-43, e-ISSN 1857-7415, p-ISSN 1409-7621, DOI: 10.2478/macvetrev-2020-0012, 2020