Original Scientific Article
Toxic effects of sodium lauryl sulfate on antioxidant defense system and DNA damage in fish primary hepatocyte cultures
Aslı Ç. Yeltekin*,
Ahmet R. Oğuz

Mac Vet Rev 2022; 45 (2): 169 - 175


Received: 22 September 2021

Received in revised form: 01 September 2022

Accepted: 05 September 2022

Available Online First: 15 September 2022

Published on: 15 October 2022

Correspondence: Aslı Ç. Yeltekin, aslicyeltekin@gmail.com


Synthetic detergents which have a major role in environmental pollution accumulate over time and reach levels that harm nature. The surfactants which are abundantly used as cleaning components are discharged into the Van Lake with the sewage water. These chemicals accumulating in the lake may reach a level that could affect the only fish species of the lake, the Van fish. This study aimed to determine the antioxidant levels of Van fish hepatocyte cell culture medium treated with sodium lauryl sulphate (SLS) and to assess the DNA damage. The effect of SLS was assessed by its dose (1x10-5, 1x10-6, 1x10-7 M) and treatment time (24 h, 48 h). Superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px), malondialdehyde (MDA), and DNA damage (8-OHdG) were determined in the SLS hepatocyte culture. SOD and GSH-Px were higher on 24 h and 48 h compared to the control group. A significant increase was observed in CAT level in the first 24 h, especially in 1x10-6 and 1x10-5 M concentration. At 48 h, it was observed that the CAT level decreased significantly as the concentration increased. It was determined that MDA and 8-OHdG levels increased depending on concentration and time. In conclusion, different concentrations of SLS affected antioxidant levels in the primary hepatocyte culture of Van Fish and were found to cause an increase in the levels of MDA and 8-OHdG.

Keywords: SLS, fish, DNA damage, antioxidants, MDA


Environmental pollution is a common problem in all nations today. The high accumulation of solid, liquid, and gaseous pollution from various sources in the air, water, and soil is the main reason for environmental pollution. While the advancement of technology provides society with more convenient living conditions, it adds new pollutants to the environment and gradually alters the natural balance. This alters the natural balance of water and threatens the health of aquatic organisms and the people who rely on them for nutrition.
The surfactants have a wide range of use, production, and consumption, and as such are considered as environmental contaminants. The water pollution with these compounds causes considerable adverse effects on living organisms disrupting its interactions (1, 2). It is difficult to predict the extent of environmental pollution that the surfactants might cause in the future considering the growing trend of their use. Non-biodegradable synthetic detergents are prone to accumulate in aqueous environments when mixed with domestic and industrial wastewater which also contains soil, sea, lake, or river water (1). Among the most widely used Personal care products is SLS, also identified as Sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), an anionic surfactant used as an emulsifying cleaning agent in household detergents such as dishwashing soaps, cosmetics, toothpastes, shampoos, shaving foams, hand soap, facial cleanser, body wash, and shaving creams. In the pharmaceutical industry, SLS is used as an agent to improve the absorption of chemicals through the skin, gastrointestinal mucosa, and other mucous membranes. It is also used as flocculant and de-inking agent in firefighting products, detergents and soaps (3, 4). Biological oxidation and degradation of the “hard” detergents is relatively long. Detergents have numerous negative effects on biological life in water below their toxic dose (5).
The understanding of metabolic and enzymatic activities in aquatic organisms as a consequence of pollutants exposure is important in understanding its toxicological effects. Enzymes as physiological and biochemical markers, are used to determine environmental pollution in aquatic organisms (6). The increase in the concentration of SLS increases the number of free radicals causing oxidative stress in living organisms. Previous studies have demonstrated that SLS exposure in aquatic organisms is manifested by oxidative stress, apoptosis, DNA damage, neurophysiological (7) and hematological effects, affected swimming performance, and changes in body morphology. In a limited number of studies, detergents were reported to have toxic and allergic effects, and cause the development of cancer cells over time (1, 8, 9).
There are many protective antioxidant mechanisms that counteract the oxidant degradation caused by free oxygen radicals. The decrease in antioxidant protection causes an increase in reactive oxygen species (ROS), accumulation of free radicals, and consequently adverse changes in the organism. The free radicals trigger oxidation of polyunsaturated fatty acids, proteins, and DNA. This process is defined as oxidative stress and damages normal functions in the body (10). ROS can affect cellular defense and cause DNA chain fractures, destroying many biochemical mechanisms (membrane ion transport system, enzymes, proteins, lipids). This damage can manifest itself in the form of serious damage to the tissues due to the disturbance in the prooxidant/ antioxidant balance. Numerous damage-products caused by DNA oxidation have been identified. The guanine derivative 8-OHGua and its deoxynucleoside 8-OHdG are more important in the detection of DNA damage (11).
Van fish is in the second place after carp in inland fish production in Turkey. It is an important source of protein for the people of the region. In addition, Van fish is an endemic fish species that can live at pH 9.8. Due to these features, it has a great economic importance. Therefore, the aim was to investigate the effect of SLS on the antioxidant enzymes (SOD, GSH-Px and CAT), lipid peroxidation (malondialdehyde, MDA), and DNA damage (8-OHdG level) in liver cultures of Van fish.


The Van fish used in the study were caught with nets from the Lake Van. The fish brought to the laboratory were studied after a 10-day adaptation period. A total of 10 fish were sampled, 5 females and 5 males. The study was approved by the Van Yüzüncü Yıl University, Experimental Animals Local Ethics Committee (Decision number 2017/05).

Cell culture
The liver tissue was removed after dissection in laminar flow cabinet. The liver tissue was treated with hepatocyte buffer (Hepatocyte Buffer: 0.145 M NaCl, 5.4 mM KCl, 5 mM EDTA, 1.1 mM KH2PO4, 12 mM NaH2CO3, 3 mM NaHPO4, pH=7.6.). After repeating this process several times over a 30-minute period, the tissue was placed in an EDTA-free hepatocyte buffer containing 2.5 mM CaCl2. Thus, the blood-cleaned tissue was incubated for 30 minutes in collagenase containing L-15 (0.5 mg/mL). After incubation, the tissue was triturated twice and centrifuged at 90 x g for 5 minutes until the resulting supernatant became clear. Antibiotic-antimycotic solution (10 mL/L) and 5 mM NaHCO3 were added at the end of the centrifugation by removing the supernatant and replacing the feed medium (Leibovitz-15) to prevent contamination. The isolated cells were stained with trypan blue (4%) to distinguish between live and dead cells (12). The erythrocyte number in the culture was <10%. The isolated hepatocytes were placed in appropriate cell culture vessels and SLS was applied at concentrations of 1x10-5, 1x10-6, and 1x10-7 M. Tissues were extracted into cell cultures at 24 and 48 hours. The supernatants obtained as a result of the extraction were examined by applying the methods described in the following text.

Analysis of antioxidant enzymes
SOD enzyme activity was measured at 505 nm at 37 °C in an autoanalyzer with the Randox -Ransod enzyme kit (13, 14). CAT enzyme activity was determined at 240 nm by the UV spectrophotometric method of Aebi (15) based on the degradation of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) by catalase. GSH-Px enzyme activity was measured at 37 ºC with Randox- Ransel enzyme kits in an autoanalyzer with the 340 nm ultraviolet method (16, 17).

Analysis of 8-OHdG levels
Homogenates were prepared according to Alak et al. (18) with minor modifications. After the necessary solutions were added to the obtained homogenates and washing processes were applied, the remaining kit procedures were performed. After adding the stop solution for reading on the ELISA device, three readings were taken for reliability at 450 nm within 10 minutes which were averaged (ELISA kit, Catalog No: 201-00- 0041/SunRed).

Analysis of Malondialdehyde (MDA) levels
Homogenates for analysis were prepared according to the modified method of Mis et al. (19). MDA level was measured by the method of Placer et al. (20) based on the spectrophotometric measurement of pink color absorbance resulting from the thiobarbituric acid (TBA) and MDA reaction.

Statistical analysis
The results are expressed as mean ± standard error. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Duncan’s multiple comparison tests were applied considering significance level of p<0.05. SPSS 23 software was used for statistical calculations.


The SOD level changed depending on the concentration. It reached a significantly higher level at 1x10-5 SLS concentration at 48 h (p<0.05) (Fig. 1).

Figure 1. Van fish hepatocyte culture exposed to SLS, time and dose dependent variation of SOD level. The letters a, b, c, and d indicate a significant difference between the groups (p<0.05)

The GSH-Px level has significantly increased with the time depending on the concentration (p<0.05) (Fig. 2).

Figure 2. Van fish hepatocyte culture exposed to SLS, time and dose dependent variation of GSH-Px level. The letters a, b, c, and d indicate a significant difference between the groups (p<0.05)

It was observed that CAT level was significantly higher on 1x10-6 a nd 1x10-5 SLS concentration at 24 h compared to the control. Significantly lower CAT levels were observed at 48 h in all three groups (p<0.05) (Fig. 3).

Figure 3. Van fish hepatocyte culture exposed to SLS, time and dose dependent variation of CAT level. The letters a, b, c, and d indicate a significant difference between the groups (p<0.05)

MDA showed significantly higher level with increasing SLS concentrations at 24 h and 48 h (p<0.05) (Fig. 4).

Figure 4. Van fish hepatocyte culture exposed to SLS, time and dose dependent variation of MDA level. The letters a, b, c, and d indicate a significant difference between the groups (p<0.05)

There was significantly higher 8-OHdG level in the hepatocyte cell culture treated with 1x10-5 and 1x10-6 SLS concentrations, especially at 48 h (p<0.05) (Fig. 5).

Figure 5. Hepatocyte cultures exposed to SLS, time and dose change of Van fish hepatocyte culture exposed to SLS, time and dose dependent variation of 8-OHdG level. The letters a, b, c, and d indicate a significant difference between the groups (p<0.05)


The SLS application to Van fish liver culture medium was observed to increase lipid peroxidation and DNA damage (8-OHdG) depending on its concentration. The antioxidant levels counteracted the free radicals formed by the effect of SLS but this was varying depending on the SLS concentration. The CAT enzyme primarily functions in peroxisomes which are located in a large number of liver tissues. The time-dependent decrease in CAT level in the hepatocyte culture may be due to denaturation or secretion inhibition caused by the SLS toxicity.
Sayed and Authman (21) aimed to assess the effects of SLS and the potential influence of Spirulina platensis in African catfish. They reported hepatic and kidney dysfunction, electrolyte imbalance, significant deterioration in enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidants, and an increase in apoptosis percentages. In another study including herb carp, it was observed that there was high microbial activity, high level of gill tissue damage and an increase in antioxidant levels (SOD and CAT) (22). Yakovenko et al. (23) studied the effect of SLS (pure and as part of detergents) on enzymes activity in energy pathways in carp reporting significantly negative changes. The current study demonstrated increased antioxidant activity in Van fish exposed to SLS which is in compliance with the previous reports.
It was determined that the levels of SOD and CAT in the liver and muscle tissues of Nile tilapia fish exposed to different doses of SLS (0.0625, 0.125, 0.25, 0.5, 1 g/L) began to decrease (24). Jifa et al. (25) applied SLS and sodium dodecyl benzene sulfonate to Japanese perch and have reported that fish attempt to tolerate oxidative stress with different levels of SOD, CAT, GSH-Px in the liver tissue. SLS applied to the Mytilus galloprovincialis triggered oxidative stress, increased ROS, and significantly increased SOD and CAT activity (26). Similarly, Suganthi et al. (27) reported high antioxidant activity in C. quinquecirrha strain following treatment with SLS. The current study demonstrated that Van fish liver culture cells respond by increased metabolic rate and antioxidant activity following SLS treatment. These findings are in compliance with numerous other reports.
Jung et al. (28) reported a significant amount of SLS absorption in intestinal tissues. Pseudosida ramosa species lost some of its functions after 21 days treatment with SLS depending on its concentration (29). Mei et al. (30) reported increased lipid peroxidation (MDA) in a mixture containing salmon oil by applying anionic SLS. Lipids are the first reserve to be used by organisms when submitted to stressful conditions. Cell membrane lipids under such conditions can be easily peroxidized by free radicals (31). Alak et al. (32) reported that apoptosis and DNA damage formation are important markers of oxidative stress resulting from toxicity (33, 34). The current study has also demonstrated DNA damage as a consequence of SLS toxicity. The toxic effects of SLS in aquatic organisms are very limited, thus the full extent of negative effects should be further elucidated.


The antioxidant level (SOD, CAT, GSH-Px), MDA, and DNA damage (8-OHdG) were negatively affected by SLS application in Van fish liver culture cells. The SLS concentration and time of exposure may be considered as significant factors of its toxic effects. SLS is a prooxidant compound. Further studies are required to elucidate the full extent of SLS toxicity in fish. The toxic effects of SLS on living organisms may cause more complex results in the future due to changes in environmental conditions and increasing amount of SLS. Therefore, future studies should address more realistic exposure scenarios for a more relevant risk assessment.


The authors declare that they have no potential conflict of interest with respect to the authorship and/or publication of this article.


This study was supported by the project of Van Yuzuncu Yil University, Scientific Research Projects with FBA-2018-6378 project.


ACY did the experiment and wrote the article. ARO did the cell culture of the study.


  1. Holland, P.M., Rubingh, D.N. (1992). Mixed surfactant systems. An overview. In: P.M. Holland, D.N. Rubingh (Eds.), Mixed surfactant systems, ACS Symposium Series Vol.501 (pp. 2-30). Washington DC: American Chemical Society https://doi.org/10.1021/bk-1992-0501.ch001
  2. Alak, G., Yeltekin, A.Ç., Özgeris, F.B., et al. (2019). Therapeutic effect of N- acetyl cysteine as an antioxidant on rainbow trout’s brain in cypermethrin toxicity. Chemosphere 221, 30-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.12.196 PMid:30634146
  3. Chaturvedi, V., Kumar, A. (2010). Toxicity of sodium dodecyl sulfate in fishes and animals. A review. Int J Appl Biol Pharm Technol. 1(2): 630-633.
  4. Freitas, R., Silvestro, S., Coppola, F., Costa, S., Meucci, V., Battaglia, F., Intorre, L., et al. (2020). Toxic impacts induced by Sodium lauryl sulfate in Mytilus galloprovincialis. Comp Biochem Physiol Part A Mol Integr Physiol. 242, 110656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpa.2020.110656 PMid:31927089
  5. Yeltekin, A.Ç., Sağlamer, E. (2019). Toxic and trace element levels in Salmo trutta macrostigma and Oncorhynchus mykiss trout raised in different environments. Polish J Env Stud. 28(3): 1613-1621. https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/90620
  6. Jimenez, B.D., Stegeman, J.J. (1990). Detoxication enzymes as indicators of environmental stress on fish. United States
  7. Bright, J. (2018). Explaining the emergence of political fragmentation on social media: the role of ideology and extremism. JCMC 23(1): 17-33. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmx002
  8. Akdis, C.A. (2021). Does the epithelial barrier hypothesis explain the increase in allergy, autoimmunity and other chronic conditions? Nat Rev Immunol. 21:739-751. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41577-021-00538-7 PMid:33846604
  9. Öter, Ç., Selçuk Zorer, Ö. (2020). Kinetic, isothermal and thermodynamic studies on Th(IV) adsorption by different modified activated carbons. J Radioanal Nucl Chem. 323(1): 341-351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-019-06830-0
  10. Gutteridge, J.M. (1995). Lipid peroxidation and antioxidants as biomarkers of tissue damage. Clin Chem. 41(12): 1819-1828. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/41.12.1819 PMid:7497639
  11. Yang, X., Li, Y., Li, Y., Ren, X., Zhang, X., Hu, D., et al. (2017). Oxidative stress-mediated atherosclerosis: mechanisms and therapies. Front Physiol. 8, 600. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2017.00600 PMid:28878685 PMCid:PMC5572357
  12. Berry, M.N., Friend, D.S. (1969). High yield preparation of isolated rat liver parenchymal cells. J Cell Biol. 43(3): 506-520. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.43.3.506 PMid:4900611 PMCid:PMC2107801
  13. Xia, E., Rao, G., Remmen, H.V., et al. (1995). Activities of antioxidant enzymes in various tissues of male Fischer rats are altered by food restriction. J Nutr. 125(2): 195-201.
  14. Flohe, L., Otting, F. (1984). Superoxide dismutase assays. Methods Enzymol. 105, 93-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0076-6879(84)05013-8
  15. Aebi, H. (1984). Catalase in vitro. Methods Enzymol. 105, 121-126. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0076-6879(84)05016-3
  16. Paglia, D.E., Valentina, W.N. (1967). Studies on the quantitative and qualitative characterization of erythrocyte glutathione peroxidase. J Lab Clin Med. 70(1): 158-169.
  17. Flohe, L., Gunzler, W.A. (1984). Assays of glutathione peroxidase. Methods Enzymol. 105, 114-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0076-6879(84)05015-1
  18. Alak, G., Ucar, A., Yeltekin, A.Ç. et al. (2018). Neuroprotective effects of dietary borax in the brain tissue ofrainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) exposed to copper-induced toxicity. Fish Physiol Biochem. 44(5): 1409-1420. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10695-018-0530-0 PMid:29959587
  19. Mis, L., Comba, B., Uslu, S., et al. (2018). Effect of wheatgrass on DNA damage, oxidative stress index and histological findings in diabetic rats. I J Morphol. 36(4): 1235-1240. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-95022018000401235
  20. Placer, Z.A., Cushman, L.L., Johnson. B.C. (1966). Estimation of product of lipid peroxidation (malonyldialdehyde) in biochemical systems. Anal Biochem. 16(2): 359-364. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697(66)90167-9
  21. Sayeda, H.A.E., Authman, M.M.N. (2018). The protective role of Spirulina platensis to alleviate the Sodium dodecyl sulfate toxic effects in the catfish Clarias gariepinus (Burchell, 1822). Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 163, 136-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.07.060 PMid:30053583
  22. Susmi, T.S., Rebello, S., Jisha, M.S. et al. (2010). Toxic effects of sodium dodecyl sulphate on grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella). Fish Technol. 47(2): 157-162.
  23. Yakovenko, B.V., Tretyak, O.P., Mekhed, O.B., et al. (2018). Effect of herbicides and surfactants on enzymes of energy metabolism in European carp. Ukr J Ecol. 8(1): 948-952. https://doi.org/10.15421/2018_297
  24. Feng, T., Li, Z.B., Guo, X.Q., Guo, J.P. (2008). Effects of trichlorfon and sodium dodecyl sulphate on antioxidant defence system and acetylcholinesterase of Tilapia nilotica in vitro. Pestic Biochem Phys. 92(3): 107-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pestbp.2007.10.002
  25. Jifa, W., Zhiming, Y., Xiuxian, S., You, W., Xihua, C. (2006). Comparative researches on effects of sodium dodecyl benzene sulfonate and sodium dodecyl sulphate upon Lateolabrax japonicus biomarker system. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol. 20(3): 465-470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.etap.2005.05.006 PMid:21783627
  26. Messina, M.C., Faggio, C., Laudicella, V.A. et al. (2014). Effect of sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS) on stress response in the Mediterranean mussel (Mytilus Galloprovincialis): Regulatory volume decrease (Rvd) and modulation of biochemical markers related to oxidative stress. Aquat Toxicol. 157, 94-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2014.10.001 PMid:25456223
  27. Suganthi, K., Sri Kumaran, N., Thenmozhi, C., et al. (2012). In vitro antioxidant activities of jelly fish Chrysaora quinquecirrha venom from southeast coast of India. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed. 2(Suppl. 1): 347-351. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2221-1691(12)60186-5
  28. Jung, H.J., Ahn, H.I., Park, J.Y. et al. (2016). Improved oral absorption of tacrolimus by a solid dispersion with hypromellose and sodium lauryl sulphate. Int J Biol Macromol. 83, 282-287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2015.11.063 PMid:26642839
  29. Freitas, E.C., Rocha, O. (2012). Acute and chronic effects of atrazine and sodium dodecyl sulphate on the tropical freshwater cladoceran Pseudosida ramosa. Ecotoxicology 21(5): 1347-1357. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-012-0888-1 PMid:22434152
  30. Mei, L., McClements, J.D., Decker, E.A. (1999). Lipid oxidation in emulsions as affected by charge status of antioxidants and emulsion droplets. J Agric Food Chem. 47(6): 2267-2273. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf980955p PMid:10794621
  31. Costa, S., Coppola, F., Pretti, C., Intorre, L., Meucci, V., Soares, A.M.V.M., Freitas, R., Solé, M. (2020). The influence of climate change related factors on the response of two clam species to diclofenac. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 189, 109899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.109899 PMid:31771782
  32. Alak, G., Parlak, V., Yeltekin, A.Ç. et al. (2019). The protective effect exerted by dietary borax on toxicity metabolism in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) tissues. Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol. 216, 82-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpc.2018.10.005 PMid:30419360
  33. Yeltekin, A.Ç., Oğuz, A.R. (2018). Antioxidant responses and DNA damage in primary hepatocytes of Van fish (Alburnus tarichi, Güldenstadt 1814) exposed to nonylphenol or octylphenol. Drug Chem Toxicol. 41(4): 415-423. https://doi.org/10.1080/01480545.2018.1461899 PMid:29722550
  34. Alak, G., Ucar, A., Yeltekin, A.Ç. et al. (2019). Neurophysiological responses in the brain tissues of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) treated with bio-pesticide. Drug Chem Toxicol. 42(2): 203-209. https://doi.org/10.1080/01480545.2018.1526180 PMid:30449198


© 2022 Yeltekin A.Ç. This is an open-access article published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Citation Information

Macedonian Veterinary Review. Volume 45, Issue 2, Pages 169-175, e-ISSN 1857-7415, p-ISSN 1409-7621, DOI: 10.2478/macvetrev-2022-0027, 2022