Original Scientific Article
β-Lactamase genes (blaCTX-M, blaSHV, blaTEM, blaOXA1 AND blaOXA2) and phylogenetic groups in ESBL producing commensal Escherichia coli isolated from faecal samples from dairy farm in the Municipality of Debar
Maksud Kerluku ,
Dean Jankuloski ,
Marija Ratkova Manovska ,
Mirko Prodanov ,
Biljana Stojanovska Dimzoska ,
Aleksandar Dodovski ,
Katerina Blagoevska *

Mac Vet Rev 2023; 46 (1): 89 - 97

10.2478/macvetrev-2023-0017

Received: 18 November 2022

Received in revised form: 25 January 2023

Accepted: 30 January 2023

Available Online First: 03 March 2023

Published on: 15 March 2023

Correspondence: Katerina Blagoevska, katerinab@fvm.ukim.edu.mk
PDF

Abstract

β-lactamases are a diverse class of enzymes produced by bacteria that present a major cause for resistance to β-lactams. In this study we analysed 159 fecal samples from dairy cows, for the presence of presumptive ESBL, AmpC, and carbapenemase-producing E. coli. Phylotyping was done using Clermont phylo-typing method, targeting arpA, ChuA, and YjaA genes, along with the DNA fragment TspE4.C2. Convetional PCR method was used to confirm the presence of bla genes among 39 phenotypically confirmed ESBL producing E. coli. The results showed presence of CTX-M, SHV, TEM and OXA1 bla genes in 28 (71.79%), 1 (2.56%), 29 (74.35%), 2 (5.12%) of isolates, respectively Twenty (51.28%) isolates showed presence of both blaCTX-M and TEM genes. The strain that carried the blaSHV gene was found to carry blaTEM gene as well, while one of the strains that carried blaOXA1 gene was also carrying blaCTX-M and TEM gene. The ration between isolates and phylo-groups was as follows: 9 (23.07%) strains were assigned to phyllo-group D; 14 (35.89%) to phyllo-group B; 16 (41.02%) to phyllo-group A. Out of the 39 strains where bla genes were identified, 29 (74.35%) were categorized as multi drug resistant.

Keywords: ESBL, E. coli, bla genes, phylogenetic groups, dairy cow

INTRODUCTION

In recent years, there has been an increase in reports of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in intensive animal production. As a result, much attention is paid on the function of antimicrobial administration and how much it influences the development of resistance in microbiota originating from food producing animals. Antibiotics are usually used in cattle for medicinal, preventive, meta phylactic, or growth-promoting goals (1). According to various reports in the developing countries, 80% of the antimicrobials used on farm animals are for growth promotion and prevention (1). Numerous studies have revealed that this extensive use of antibiotics may have had a significant role in the selection and spread of antimicrobial-resistance among bacteria (2), and in the existence of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) genes in the genome of the human and animal microbiome, as well as in bacteria originating from the environment (3). Resistant pathogenic bacteria are the main cause for recognizing antimicrobial resistance (AMR) as top ten priority of the “One Health” concept, because it affects humans, animals and the environment (4).
To monitor the AMR prevalence in healthy animals, commensal bacteria, such as Escherichia coli (E. coli) is widely used as indicator for monitoring AMR on farms (5). Moreover, since manure is used to improve soil quality, animal faeces poses as a significant threat for the dissemination of resistant bacteria into the environment and potentially to humans (6).
For clinicians and public health officials, the resistance of commensal E. coli to β-lactam antibiotics due to extended spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs) is a particular cause for concern (7). ESBLs are a class of enzymes that hydrolyze oxyimino-β-lactams including extended-spectrum cephalosporins, while excluding cephamycins and carbapenems (8). So far, a wide range of ESBL types has been described. Although E. coli bla genes exhibit wide genetic diversity, blaSHV, blaTEM, and blaCTX-M enzyme types are the most prevalent ones (9).
In recent years, it has become important to evaluate how different phylogenetic groups of E. coli strains differ in their antibiotic resistance. According to phylogenetic analysis, E. coli falls into four major phylogenetic groups (A, B1, B2, and D). E. coli strains from phylogenetic groups B2 and D are often more virulent, but less resistant to antimicorbials, whereas most commensal strains belong to groups A and B1 (10). The latter ones are less virulent but possess higher resistance rate (10).
The commensal E. coli strains isolated from animal faeces may be affected by geographic region or the purpose for which animals are being kept (dairy or beef), as well as by the antimicrobial treatments that animals are receiving, if any. The improper use of antibiotics by farm owners should not be neglected as well, as a crucial link in the complete antimicrobial resistance chain. Additionally, commensal E. coli can acquire some virulence genes from other bacteria through horizontal gene transfer, resulting in different pathovars causing clinically and epidemiologically distinctive diseases (11). Therefore, it is important to have knowledge of the antimicrobial resistance patterns of commensal E. coli originating from animal’s faeces and their phylogentic group belonging. For that purpose, we conducted this research, to screen the presence of bla genes and phylogenetic group belonging of ESBL-producing commensal E. coli strains, isolated from faecal samples originating from dairy farms in the Municipality of Debar.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Sample collection
For the purpose of this study, 159 faecal samples were taken from 34 dairy farms from the territory of Debar Municipality, during the period from June 2019 to February 2020. The farms were chosen by their location, to be able to cover a major part of the Municipality of Debar.

Isolation and identification of ESBL E. coli 
All 159 faecal samples from dairy cows, were analyzed for presence of presumptive ESBL, AmpC, and carbapenemase-producing E. coli according to the EU Reference Laboratory for Antimicrobial Resistance (EURL-AMR DTU) and the Directive 2013/652/EU (12, 13). At the initial step, one g of faecal sample was enriched with Buffered Peptone Water (BPW) (Merck, Germany) in a ratio 1:10, and then incubated for 18 to 22 hours at 37±1 °C. Than one loopful (10 μl loop) from the enriched sample was subcultured over the surface of MacConkey agar (Oxoid, UK) supplemented with 1 mg/L cefotaxime (CTX) by streaking and incubated at 44 °C+/-0.5 °C for 18-22 hours. Presumptive ESBL/AmpC producing E. coli lactose fermenting enterobacterales exhibited red/purple colonies on MacConkey plates. To confirm the presence of E. coli, a colony from MacConkey+Cefotaxim plate, was cultured on TBX medium. Green colonies growth on TBX plates were considered as presumptive E. coli.

DNA extraction
Genomic bacterial DNA isolation was performed from fresh culture on a pure bacterial isolate from nonselective TSA agar by suspending a loop full of colonies in 990 μl UltraPure DNase/Rnase free distilled water (Invitrogen, USA). The bacterial suspension was than incubated 15 minutes at 100 ºC in Thermo block (MRC, Israel) without shaking. The resulting thermolysate was then centrifuged at 18,000 g/5 min. (Hettich, Germany), after which the supernatant was transferred in new tubes and kept at -20 ºC until further analyses.

β-Lactamase genes confirmation
Conventional PCR method was performed in order to detect blaCTX-M, blaTEM, blaSHV, blaOXA1, and blaOXA2 genes in isolates with an ESBL phenotype (14). PCR, assay was performed using primers displayed in Table 1. PCR protocol (Qiagen, Netherlands) consisted of 30 cycles (30 s of denaturation at 94 ℃, 30 s of annealing at temperatures as shown in Table 1 and 60 s of extension at 72 ℃) after one step of 5 min at 94 ℃ (14). PCR products were analyzed in 2% agarose gel (Merck, Germany) containing 25 μg of ethidium bromide (Merck, Germany) in tris-EDTA buffer, and the gel was photographed under ultraviolet illuminator using gel documentation system ChemiDoc MP Imaging System (Bio-Rad, USA) stain-free technology imaging, analyzing and documentation of gels.

The Clermont Escherichia coli phylo-typing methodology
Isolates that exhibited standard Escherichia coli phenotype (such as lactose +, green colonies on TBX plate) were tested using the quadruplex approach following the protocol as described in (15). First, the isolates were subjected to quadruplex PCR. Each strain is assigned a quadruplex genotype based on the presence or absence of the four genes. The isolate was then allocated in a phylo-group based on the quadruplex genotype obtained by scoring the presence/absence of the genes in the order arpA/chuA/yjaA/TspE4.C2, as given in Table 2.
Primer sequences and PCR conditions for the new phylo-group assignment method are presented in Table 3.
All PCR reactions were carried out in a 20 μl volume containing 2 μl of 10X buffer (provided with Taq polymerase), 2 mM each dNTP, 2 U of Taq polymerase, 3 μl of bacterial lysate or 2 μl of DNA (at about 100 ng ml-1) (Applied Biosystems, USA) and the relevant primers (Invitrogen, USA). The primers’ concentration in the PCR reaction was 20 pmol for all primers, except for AceK.f (40 pmol), ArpA1.r (40 pmol), trpBA.f (12 pmol), and trpBA.r (12 pmol). Denaturation was performed 4 minutes at 94 °C, followed by 30 cycles of 5 seconds at 94 °C and 20 seconds at 57 °C (group E) or 59 °C (quadruplex and group C), and a final extension step of 5 minutes at 72 °C. ArpAgpE.f and ArpAgpE.r and trpAgpC.f and trpAgpC.r were the primers used for the allele-specific phylo-groups E and C PCRs, respectively (17). As an internal control in E- and C-specific PCR reactions, the primers trpBA.f and trpBA.r were used (15).





RESULTS

Out of the 159 faecal samples from dairy cows, 39 (24.52%) were phenotypically confirmed as presumptive ESBL-producing E. coli. The presence of bla genes in isolates with the ESBL phenotype was confirmed by molecular analyses in 38 out of 39 (97.43%). The results showed presence of 28 (71.79%), 1 (2.56%), 29 (74.35%), 2 (5.12%) for CTX-M, SHV, TEM and OXA1 bla genes, respectively. No OXA2 bla gen was detected. Twenty strains (51.2%) showed presence of both blaCTX-M and TEM genes, while one of the strains (2.56%) carrying blaSHV gene was found to have blaTEM gene as well. One of the two strains positive to blaOXA1 gene was found to be carrying blaCTX-M and blaTEM gene, while the other strain was carring blaOXA1 and blaTEM.
Regarding the results from phylo-typing, all strains were assigned to three phylo-groups out of seven. The data indicated that most prevalent phyllo-group is A (41.02%), followed by B1 (35.89%) and D (23.07%).
The distribution of bla genes in relation to the phylogenetic group is given in Table 4. From the isolates carrying blaCTX-M gene 12 (42.85%) belonged to phylo-group B1, followed with 11 (39.28%) isolates in phylo-group A and 5 (17.85%) in phylo-group D. 


Almost half of the isolates (48.27%) carrying blaTEM gene, were assigned to phylo-group A, while 37.93% belonged to phylogroup B1 and 14% were assigned to phylo-group D. The one isolate in which blaSHV gene was detected, belonged to the phylo-group D, while the two isolates carrying OXA1 gene were assigned to phylo-group A and D, each.
According to the antimicrobial susceptibility testing of all isolates with the use of micorbroth dilution method (data not shown), 29 (74.35%) strains were categorized as multidrug resistant (MDR). Out of the 29 MDR isolates, 48.27% belonged to phyllo-group A, followed by groups B1 and D with 27.58% and 24.13%, respectively.

DISCUSSION

ESBLs are plasmid-encoded, meaning that these resistance determinants are prevalent in our environment and may be easily transmitted from one organism to another. The significant prevalence of these ESBL producers in animal fecal samples supports the hypothesis that animals might become infection sources or even reservoirs (natural persistent sources of infection), aiding in the spread of these bacteria. The findings and supporting data given here imply that dairy cattle farms are a substantial source of ESBLs producing E. coli that play an important role in resistance dissemination across the ‘One Health’ concept. In our survey, the ESBL phenotype was found in 24.52% of all commensal E. coli isolates. Similar results 24.6%, were obtained in faecal samples from intensive swine farms in Portugal (17) and in wild ducks’ faeces from Bangladesh (18). However, these results are lower than the ones reported for ESBL phenotype in dairy cattle from China (45.9%), Egypt (46.6%) and Nigeria (63.2%) (19, 20, 21). Similar results as in this survey were obtained in a study that involved an outpatient setting in Nepal, where ESBL confirmed phenotype was 25.8% (22), in uropathogenic E. coli isolated from outpatients in Iran (23) and in rectal samples from healthy infants, where ESBL E. coli was confirmed in 33.3% (24). Numerous studies have reported a high prevalence of ESBL producing E. coli in environmental samples, especially from farm environments. In a study on the diversity of ESBL producing E. coli in poultry farm environment, ESBL phenotype was confirmed in 100% of soil samples, in rinse water and run off water (81% and 79%, respectively) and 60% in dust (25). These studies illustrate identifiable epidemiological cycles between particular reservoirs, such as cattle (and meat), people in general and clinical populations.
The first reports of blaCTX-M-carrying bovine faecal E. coli isolates in American livestock came in 2010 (26). The TEM and SHV genes predominated in the earliest ESBL cases, but more and more CTX-M cases are now being reported from a number of countries, including Africa, India, Iran, and industrialized nations like France, Canada, and the UK (27). The blaCTX-M-1 gene was found to be the most prevalent in two separate independent studies that used faecal samples from various barns to search for the most common bla genes in E. coli. The first study involved Thoroughbred race horses in Ontario, Canada (28), and the second involved race horses in Korea (29). The poultry industry revealed similar results for other Enterobacteriaceae family members, specifically Salmonella enterica and Escherichia coli, respectively. Both strains had high levels of blaCTX-M-1, which originated from the same source: the gastrointestinal tract of Dutch broilers (30).
In terms of the prevalence of bla genes, we found that 97% of the strains carry at least one of the targeted bla genes; however, thorough genotype analyses revealed that E. coli isolates carried a variety of ESBL bla genes, with blaTEM and blaCTX-M being the two most common. The reported findings are consistent with a crosssectional study on outpatient departments (OPD) and intensive care units (ICU), which found that 25.8% of strains were phenotypically confirmed to be ESBL E. coli, with the most prevalent type being blaCTX-M, which was followed by blaTEM (29.2%) and blaSHV (12.5%) (23).
Despite the fact that isolates displayed phenotypic traits toward a wide range of cephalosporins, which can be explained by the potential presence of other ESBL genes, in our results only one isolate did not show presence of any of the targeted bla genes. Similar data were obtained in a study that investigates ESBL phenotypes and genotypes among ESBL-positive isolates from outpatients (23). Increased distribution of the ESBL genotype blaCTX-M in humans, animals, and environmental sources reveals a crucial concern in the management of infectious diseases (31).
The data obtained in this study have been analyzed regarding the coexistence of various β-lactamase genes within the same strain and their interactions. The results showed that 2.6% of the strains that carried the blaSHV gene, were found to be positive for the blaTEM gene, and 69% of strains demonstrated presence of both the blaCTX-M and blaTEM genes. It was discovered that one of the two strains (5.4%) that were positive for the blaOXA1 gene also carried the blaCTX-M gene. These findings are in correlation with the data from numerous similar studies in both human and veterinary medicine (17, 22, 23, 32).
According to our findings, 23% of the isolates were in group D, 36% were in group B1, and 41% belonged to phylo-group A. The classification of commensal E. coli into the A and B1 phylogroups was as expected from the beginning of this study and supported by findings from other studies. For example, a study that evaluates the genotyping diversity of E. coli from untreated, healthy dairy cows confirmed that the isolates belonged to phylogenetic groups A, B1, B2, and D, with the majority of isolates belonging to B1 and then A (33). Additionally, the phylogenetic analysis of E. coli from geographically distinct human populations revelaed that strains from phylogenetic groups A (40%) and B1 (34%) were most prevalent, followed by strains from phylogenetic group D (15%) (34).
The most common commensal E. coli strains are found in group A, while the most virulent extraintestinal strains are primarily found in group B2 and to a lesser extent, group D (35). Many scientists have looked at the distribution of the main phylogenetic groups among the E. coli strains found in humans and animals. While human groups A and B1 are commensal strains, groups B2 and D are frequently designated for extraintestinal pathogenic E. coli (31). Moreover, our findings are consistent with those of a study on domestic animals, specifically dogs and their owners, in which two groups of isolates were assigned to phyllo-groups to evaluate their phylogenetic relationships. Findings show that the isolates had similar genotypes, with phylo-group A accounting for the majority of cases (55% of dogs and owners) and being the most prevalent (36). The A and B1 groups are more frequently associated with commensal strains on one of the phylo-groups. In other animals and various studies, the assignment of E. coli ESBL strains was made, for instance, it was discovered that group B1 was more prevalent in isolates of E. coli in healthy food-producing animals. While group A was discovered to be more common in pigs and chickens (17, 37), group B was found to be more common in cattle (36).

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, our survey demonstrated the overall situation of antibiotic resistance in faecal E. coli isolates from the dairy farms in the Municipality of Debar. The findings suggest that dairy cows might be a significant reservoir of resistant E. coli, thus posing a substantial risk to human health. It is due to the fact that dairy cattle have a direct connection to environmental variables, particularly water, and that contaminated water significantly contributes to the spread of β-lactamase producing E. coli in humans. The high occurrence of MDR ESBL-producing E. coli in this survey is a cause for concern, emphasizing the importance of following rules concerning the use of antibiotics and growth promoters in food-producing animals.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare that they have no potential conflict of interest with respect to the authorship and/or publication of this article.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This research was part of the project financed by Faculty of Veterinary Medicine-Skopje, Code FVM-IPR-01 (Decision no. 0202/2090/3, from 3.12.2019) with the title “Antimicrobial resistance of commensal Escherichia coli in Republic of Macedonia”. The authors would like to thank colleagues from the Laboratory of food and feed microbiology and Laboratory for molecular food analyses and GMO at the Food Institute at the Faculty of veterinary medicine in Skopje, for their cooperation and contribution to this study.

AUTHORS’ CONTRIBUTIONS

MK conceived the study, did the experimental examinations and wrote the manuscript. MK and MP contributed with the collecting of the raw milk samples. BSD, MRM and MP contributed to the microbiological and molecular analyses. MRM, DJ, BSD, AD and KB contributed to the study design. MP and AD contributed to data analyzing. KB, MRM and DJ supervised the study, gave critical revision and contributed to the final version of the manuscript.

References

1.Hosain, M.Z., Kabir, S.M.L., Kamal, M.M. (2021). Antimicrobial uses for livestock production in developing countries. Vet World. 14(1): 210-221. https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2021.210-221 PMid:33642806 PMCid:PMC7896880
2. Serwecińska, L. (2020). Antimicrobials and antibiotic-resistant bacteria: a risk to the environment and to public health. Water 12(12): 3313. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12123313 
3. Larsson, D.G.J., Flach, C.F. (2022). Antibiotic resistance in the environment. Nat Rev Microbiol. 20, 257-269. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-021-00649-x PMid:34737424 PMCid:PMC8567979 
4. Velazquez-Meza, M.E., Galarde-López, M., Carrillo-Quiróz, B., Alpuche-Aranda, C.M. (2022). Antimicrobial resistance: one health approach. Vet World. 15(3): 743-749. https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2022.743-749 PMid:35497962 PMCid:PMC9047147
5. Massé, J., Lardé, H., Fairbrother, J.M., Roy, J-P., Francoz, D., Dufour, S., Archambault, M. (2021). Prevalence of antimicrobial resistance and characteristics of Escherichia coli isolates from faecal and manure pit samples on dairy farms in the Province of Québec, Canada. Front Vet Sci. 8, 654125. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2021.654125 PMid:34095273 PMCid:PMC8175654
6. Black, Z., Balta, I., Black, L., Naughton, P.J., Dooley, J.S.G., Corcionivoschi, N. (2021). The fate of foodborne pathogens in manure treated soil. Front Microbiol. 12, 781357. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.781357 PMid:34956145 PMCid:PMC8702830
7. Madec, J.Y., Haenni, M., Nordmann, P., Poirel, L. (2017). Extended-spectrum β-lactamase/AmpC- and carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in animals: a threat for humans? Clin Microbiol Infect. 23(11): 826-833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2017.01.013 PMid:28143782
8. Castanheira, M., Simner, P.J., Bradford, P.A. (2021). Extended-spectrum β-lactamases: an update on their characteristics, epidemiology and detection. JAC-Antimicrob Resist. 3(3): dlab092. https://doi.org/10.1093/jacamr/dlab092 PMid:34286272 PMCid:PMC8284625
9. Alipour, M., Jafari, A. (2019). Evaluation of the prevalence of blaSHV, blaTEM, and blaCTX Genes in Escherichia coli isolated from urinary tract infections. Avicenna J Clin Microbiol Infect. 6(3): 83-87. https://doi.org/10.34172/ajcmi.2019.15 
10. Carlos, C., Pires, M.M., Stoppe, N.C., Hachich, E.M., Sato, M.I., Gomes, T.A., Amaral, L.A., Ottoboni, L.M. (2010). Escherichia coli phylogenetic group determination and its application in the identification of the major animal source of faecal contamination. BMC Microbiol. 10, 161. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-10-161 PMid:20515490 PMCid:PMC2889953
11. Ramos, S., Silva, V., Dapkevicius, M.L.E., Caniça, M., Tejedor-Junco, M.T., Igrejas, G., Poeta, P. (2020). Escherichia coli as commensal and pathogenic bacteria among food-producing animals: health implications of extended spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) production. Animals (Basel) 10(12): 2239. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10122239 PMid:33260303 PMCid:PMC7761174
12. EURL-AMR DTU [Internet]. Isolation of ESBL-, AmpC- and carbapenemase-producing E. coli from caecal samples. Laboratory protocol. December 2019. Version 7. https://www.eurl- ar.eu/CustomerData/ Files/Folder s/21-protocols/530_esbl-ampccpeprotocol- version-caecal-v7-09-12-19.pdf 
13. Commission Implementing Decision of 12 November 2013 on the Monitoring and reporting of antimicrobial resistance in zoonotic and commensal bacteria 2013/652/EU. (2013). OJEU 14.11.2013
14. Dierikx, C.M., van Duijkeren, E., Schoormans, A.H.W., van Essen-Zandbergen, A., Veldman, K., Kant, A., Mevius, D.J. (2012). Occurrence and characteristics of extended-spectrum-β-lactamase- and AmpC-producing clinical isolates derived from companion animals and horses. J Antimicrob Chemother. 67(6): 1368-1374. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dks049 PMid:22382469
15. Clermont, O., Christenson, J.K., Denamur, E., Gordon, D.M. (2013). The Clermont Escherichia coli phylo‐typing method revisited: improvement of specificity and detection of new phylo‐groups. Environ Microbiol Rep. 5(1): 58-65. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-2229.12019 PMid:23757131
16. Athanasakopoulou, Z., Reinicke, M., Diezel, C., Sofia, M., Chatzopoulos, D.C., Braun, S.D., Reissig, A., et al. (2021). Antimicrobial resistance genes in ESBL-Producing Escherichia coli isolates from
animals in Greece. Antibiotics. 10(4): 389. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10040389 PMid:33916633 PMCid:PMC8067336
17. Gonçalves, A., Torres, C., Silva, N., Carneiro, C., Radhouani, H., Coelho, C., Araújo, C., et al. (2010). Genetic characterization of extended-spectrum beta-lactamases in Escherichia coli isolates of pigs from a Portuguese intensive swine farm. Foodborne Pathog Dis. 7(12): 1569-1573. https://doi.org/10.1089/fpd.2010.0598 PMid:20704503
18. Islam, M.S., Sobur, M.A., Rahman, S. et al. (2022). Detection of blaTEM, blaCTX-M, blaCMY, and blaSHV genes among extended-spectrum betalactamase- producing Escherichia coli isolated from migratory birds travelling to Bangladesh. Microb Ecol. 83(4): 942-950. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-021-01803-x PMid:34312710 PMCid:PMC8313370
19. Zhang, Y.L., Huang, F.Y., Gan, L.L., Yu, X., Cai, D.J., Fang, J., Zhong, Z.J., et al. (2021). High prevalence of blaCTX-M and blaSHV among ESBL producing E. coli isolates from beef cattle in China’s Sichuan-Chongqing circle. Sci Rep. 11, 13725. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-93201-z PMid:34215807 PMCid:PMC8253751
20. Braun, S.D., Ahmed, M.F.E., El-Adawy, H., Hotzel, H., Engelmann, I., Weiß, D., Monecke, S., Ehricht, R. (2016). Surveillance of extended-spectrum betalactamase-producing Escherichia coli in dairy cattle farms in the Nile delta, Egypt. Front. Microbiol. 7, 1020. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.01020 PMid:27458435 PMCid:PMC4931819
21. Olowe, O. A., Adewumi, O., Odewale, G., Ojurongbe, O., Adefioye, O.J. (2015). Phenotypic and molecular characterisation of extended-spectrum betalactamase producing Escherichia coli obtained from animal fecal samples in Ado Ekiti, Nigeria. J Environ Public Health. 2015, 497980. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/497980 PMid:26417371 PMCid:PMC4568380
22. Pokhrel, R.H., Thapa, B., Kafle, R. (2014). Co-existence of beta-lactamases in clinical isolates of Escherichia coli from Kathmandu, Nepal. BMC Res Notes. 7, 694. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-7-694 PMid:25287013 PMCid:PMC4197279 
23. Mirkalantari, S., Masjedian, F., Irajian, G., Siddig, E., Fattahi, A. (2020). Determination of the frequency of β-lactamase genes (bla SHV, bla TEM, bla CTX-M) and phylogenetic groups among ESBL-producing uropathogenic Escherichia coli isolated from outpatients. JLM 44(1): 27-33. https://doi.org/10.1515/labmed-2018-0136 
24. Popova, G., Jankuloski, D., Felix, B., Boskovska, K., Stojanovska-Dimzovska, B., Tasic, V., Blagoevska, K. (2018). Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis used for typing of extended-spectrum-β-lactamases-producing Escherichia coli Isolated from infant ҆s respiratory and digestive system. Mac Vet Rev. 41(2): 133-141. https://doi.org/10.2478/macvetrev-2018-0016 
25. Blaak, H., van Hoek, A., Hamidjaja, R.A., van der Plaats, R., Kerkhof-de, H.L. (2015). Distribution, numbers, and diversity of ESBL-producing E. coli in the poultry farm environment. PLoS ONE 10(8): e0135402. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0135402 PMid:26270644 PMCid:PMC4536194
26. Kamaruzzaman, E.A., Abdul Aziz, S., Bitrus, A.A., Zakaria, Z., Hassan, L. (2020). Occurrence and characteristics of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli from dairy cattle, milk, and farm environments in peninsular Malaysia. Pathogens 9(12): 1007. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9121007 PMid:33266299 PMCid:PMC7760176
27. Wittum, T.E., Mollenkopf, D.F., Daniels, J.B., Parkinson, A.E., Mathews, J.L., Fry, P.R., Abley, M.J., Gebreyes, W.A. (2010). CTX-M-type extendedspectrum β-lactamases present in Escherichia coli from the faeces of cattle in Ohio, United States. Foodborne Pathog Dis. 7(12): 1575-1579. https://doi.org/10.1089/fpd.2010.0615 PMid:20707724
28. Shnaiderman-Torban, A., Navon-Venezia, S., Paitan, Y. (2020). Extended spectrum β lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae shedding by racehorses in Ontario, Canada. BMC Vet Res. 16, 479. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-020-02701-z PMid:33298039 PMCid:PMC7726890
29. Kim, D.H., Chung, Y.S., Park, Y.K., Yang, S.J., Lim, S.K., Park, Y.H., Park, K.T. (2016). Antimicrobial resistance and virulence profiles of Enterococcus spp. isolated from horses in Korea. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis. 48, 6-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cimid.2016.07.001 PMid:27638114
30. Dierikx, C., van Essen-Zandbergen, A., Veldman, K., Smith, H., Mevius, D. (2010). Increased detection of extended spectrum beta-lactamase producing Salmonella enterica and Escherichia coli isolates from poultry. Vet Microbiol. 145(3-4): 273-278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2010.03.019 PMid:20395076
31. Wang, J., Ma, Z.B., Zeng, Z.L., Yang, X.W., Huang, Y., Liu, J.H. (2017). The role of wildlife (wild birds) in the global transmission of antimicrobial resistance genes. Zool Res. 38(2): 55-80. https://doi.org/10.24272/j.issn.2095-8137.2017.024 PMid:28825455 PMCid:PMC5571481 
32. Gundran, R.S., Cardenio, P.A., Villanueva, M.A. et al. (2019). Prevalence and distribution of blaCTX-M, blaSHV, blaTEM genes in extended- spectrum β- lactamase- producing E. coli isolates from broiler farms in the Philippines. BMC Vet Res. 15, 227. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-019-1975-9 PMid:31277658 PMCid:PMC6612079
33. Houser, B.A., Donaldson, S.C., Padte, R., Sawant, A.A., DebRoy, C., Jayarao, B.M. (2008). Assessment of phenotypic and genotypic diversity of Escherichia coli shed by healthy lactating dairy cattle. Foodborne Pathog Dis. 5(1): 41-51. https://doi.org/10.1089/fpd.2007.0036 PMid:18260814
34. Duriez, P., Clermont, O., Bonacorsi, S., Bingen, E., Chaventré, A., Elion, J., Picard, B., Denamur, E. (2001). Commensal Escherichia coli isolates are phylogenetically distributed among geographically distinct human populations. Microbiology (Reading). 147(Pt 6): 1671-1676. https://doi.org/10.1099/00221287-147-6-1671 PMid:11390698
35. Johnson, J.R., Stell, A.L. (2000). Extended virulence genotypes of Escherichia coli strains from patients with urosepsis in relation to phylogeny and host compromise. J Infect Dis. 181(1): 261-272. https://doi.org/10.1086/315217 PMid:10608775
36. Carvalho, A.C., Barbosa, A.V., Arais, L.R., Ribeiro, P.F., Carneiro, V.C., Cerqueira, A. M. (2016). Resistance patterns, ESBL genes, and genetic relatedness of Escherichia coli from dogs and owners. Braz J Microbiol. 47(1): 150-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjm.2015.11.005 PMid:26887238 PMCid:PMC4822764
37. Reich, F., Atanassova, V., Klein, G. (2013). Extended-spectrum β-lactamase- and AmpC-producing enterobacteria in healthy broiler chickens, Germany. Emerg Infect Dis. 19(8): 1253-1259. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid1908.120879 PMid:23876576 PMCid:PMC3739521


Copyright

© 2023 Kerluku M. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declared that they have no potential lict of interest with respect to the authorship and/or publication of this article.

Citation Information

Macedonian Veterinary Review. Volume 46, Issue 1, Pages 89-97, e-ISSN 1857-7415, p-ISSN 1409-7621, DOI: 10.2478/macvetrev-2023-0017, 2023