Original Scientific Article
Two possibile hormonal treatment methods for inducing follicular growth in dairy cows with inactive-static ovaries
Branko Atanasov ,
Ljupco Mickov ,
Igor Esmerov ,
Ksenija Ilievska ,
Martin Nikolovski ,
Toni Dovenski

Mac Vet Rev 2014; 37 (2): 171 - 177

10.14432/j.macvetrev.2014.09.023

Received: 25 June 2014

Received in revised form: 18 August 2014

Accepted: 29 August 2014

Available Online First: 15 September 2014

Published on: 15 October 2014

PDF HTML

Abstract

Postpartum anestrus is a physiological phenomenon in high-producing dairy cows. Static ovaries have been related as major contributors for its occurrence causing a significant reproductive problem to the dairy industry. Different treatment methods have been employed with inconsistent rate of success in initiation of cyclicity, requiring further investigations in order to achieve satisfactory results. The aim of the present study was to compare the ovarian response in cows diagnosed with static ovaries, more than 60 days postpartum using two different hormonal treatment (GnRH and eCG) methods. A total of 58 acyclic cows (no CL, follicles<8mm, P4<0.5ng/mL) were randomly divided into three groups: GnRH (Group 1, n=23), eCG (Group 2, n=23) and Controls (n=12), and allocated thereafter, into subgroups according to the applied doses of GnRH (100μg or 250μg); eCG (750 IU or 1000 IU) whilst control group cows were left untreated. Daily follicular growth rate and treatment respond interval were estimated based on repeated ultrasound examinations. Blood serum P4 sampling was done on d -7, d-0 (start of the experiment) and on d 7 after ovulation. Resumption of cyclic activity occurred in 55.17% (32/58) of the treated cows, 56.52% in Group 1; 60.86% in Group 2 and 41.66% in the control group. Overall, the follicular growth rate was similar between the trials group and significant with regard to the cows in the control group (p<0.05). eCG or GnRH treated cows responded significantly faster 6.85±0.2 and 7.84±0.2 days, respectively, in comparison to the control group cows (17±0.7 days, p<0.001). Treatment with a single dose of GnRH or eCG caused resumption of follicular growth and ovulation following luteogenesis (forming CL) without significant changes in P4 concentrations on day 7 after ovulation (p>0.05). Cows in Group 2 had significantly higher incidence of multiple ovulations than cows in Group 1 (p<0.05). The eCG treatment resulted in a faster response and higher ovulation rate compared to GnRH treatment. In conclusion, both treatments have shown acceptable results in resumption of cyclicity in dairy cows with static ovaries.

Keywords: true anoestrus, ovary, GnRH, eCG, dairy cow


References

1. Adams, G.P., Matteri, R.L., Kastelic, J.P., Ko, J.C.H., Ginther, O.J., (1992). Association between surges in follicle-stimulating hormone and emergence of follicular waves in heifers. J. Repro. Fert. 94, 177-188. http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/jrf.0.0940177
2. Armstrong, D.G., Webb, R. (1997). Ovarian follicular dominance: the role of intra-ovarian growth factors and novel proteins. Rev. Repro. 2, 139–146.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/ror.0.0020139
3. Arthur, H. G., Noakes, D.E., Pearson, H. (1989). Veterinary reproduction and obstetrics. Theriogenology, Sixth edition W.B Saunders, Toronto.
4. Brown, J. L., Reeves, J. J. (1983). Absence of specific luteinizing hormone releasing hormone receptors in ovine, bovine and porcine ovaries. Biol. Reprod. 29, 1179–1182. http://dx.doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod29.5.1179 PMid:6317071
5. Diskin, M.G., Austin, E.J., Roche, J.F. (2002). Exogenous hormonal manipulation of ovarian activity in cattle. Dom. Anim. Endo. 2, 211–228.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0739-7240(02)00158-3
6. Diskin, M.G., Mackey, D.R., Roche, J.F., Sreenan, J.M. (2003). Effects of nutrition and metabolic status on circulating hormones and ovarian follicle development in cattle. Anim. Repro. Sci. 78, 345–370. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4320(03)00099-X PMid:12818653
7. Dovenski T., Kocoski, Lj., Trojacanec, P., Popovski, K., Mickovski, G., Petkov, V., Veselinovic, S., Ivkov, V., Ivancev, N., Ickov, R., Mickov, Lj. (2000). Ultrasound diagnosis of functional ovarian disorders in dairy cows and its adequate treatment. Proceedings Symposium on veterinary clinical pathology and therapy “Clinica Veterinaria”, 35-50. Budva (in Serbian).
8. Drackley, J. K., Dann, H. M., Douglas, G. N., Guretzky, N. A. J., Litherland, N. B., Underwood, J. P., Loor, J. J. (2005). Physiological and pathological adaptations in dairy cows that may increase susceptibility to periparturient diseases and disorders. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 4, 323-344.
9. Gabor, Gy., Kastelic, JP., Pinter, S., Szasz, F., Szigeti, E., Solymosi N. (2002). Improving reproductive performance in lactating dairy cows by synchronizing ovulation or inducing oestrus. Acta Vet. Hung. 50 (2), 231-234. http://dx.doi.org/10.1556/AVet.50.2002.2.12
10. Ginther, O.J., Beg. M.A., Donadeu, F.X., Bergfelt, D.R. (2003). Mechanism of follicle deviation in monoovular farm species. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 78, 239-257.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4320(03)00093-9
11. Ginther, O.J., Kastelic, J.P., Knopf, L. (1989). Compositions and characteristics of follicular waves during the bovine estrous cycle. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 20, 187-200.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-4320(89)90084-5
12. Gümen, A., Guenther, J.N, Wiltbank, M.C. (2003). Follicular size and response to ovsynch versus detection of estrus in anovular and ovular lactating dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 86, 3184 –3194. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73921-6
13. Hayashi Ken-Go, Motozumi Matsui, Takashi Shimizu, Natsuko Sudo, Ayako Sato, Koumei Shirasuna, Masa Tetsuka, Katsuya Kida, Dieter Schams, Akio Miyamoto. (2008). The absence of corpus luteum formation alters the endocrine profile and affects follicular development during the first follicular wave in cattle. Reproduction 136, 787–797.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/REP-07-0480 PMid:18715982
14. Jolly, P. D., McDougall, S., Fitzpatrick, L. A., Macmillan, K. L., Entwistle, K. W. (1995). Physiological effects of undernutrition on postpartum anoestrus in cows. J. Reprod. Fertil. Suppl. 49, 477–492. PMid:7623336
15. Lopez, H., Caraviello, D. Z., Satter, L. D., Fricke, P. M., Wiltbank, M. C. (2005). Relationship between level of milk production and multiple ovulations in lactating dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 88, 2783–2793. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(05)72958-1
16. Lopez-Gatius, F., Lopez-Bejar, M., Rutllant, J., Yaniz, J., Santolaria, P. (1999). Persistent follicles in high-producing dairy cows. Proc EETA Annual Meeting, 190 abst., Lyon, France.
17. Lopez-Gatius, F., Santolaria, P., Yaniz, J., Ruthant, J., Lopez-Bejar, M. (2001). Persistent ovarian follicles in dairy cows: a therapeutic approach. Theriogenology, 56, 649-659. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(01)00596-9
18. Lucy, M. C., McDougall, S., Nation, D. P. (2004). The use of hormonal treatments to improve the reproductive performance of lactating dairy cows in feedlot or pasture-based management systems. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 82-83, 495–512. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2004.05.004 PMid:15271476
19. Mansoor, A. R., Taha, M. M., Ahmed, K. D., Majeed, A. F. (2011). Treatment of inactive ovaries in dairy cows. Al-Anbar. J. Vet. Sci., 4, 1.
20. Moore, K., Thatcher, W. W. (2006). Major advances associated with reproduction in dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 89, 1254–1266. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72194-4
21. Mussard, ML., Burke, CR.,Behlke, EJ., Gasser, CL., Day, ML. (2007). Influence of premature induction of a luteinizing hormone surge with gonadotropin-releasing hormone on ovulation, luteal function, and fertility in cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 85, 937-943. http://dx.doi.org/10.2527/jas.2006-592 PMid:17145968
22. Newcomb, R., Christie, W.B., Rowson, L.E.A., Walters, D.E., Bousfield, W.E.D., (1979). Influence of dose, repeated treatment and batch of hormone on ovarian response in heifers treated with PMSG. J Reprod Fertil., 56, 113–118. http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/jrf.0.0560113
23. Opsomer, G,. Coryn, M., Deluyker, H., de Kruif, A. (1998). An analysis of ovarian dysfunction in high yielding dairy cows after calving based on progesterone profiles. Reprod Domest Anim., 33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0531.1998.tb01342.x
24. Opsomer, G., Mijten, P., Coryn M., de Kruif, A. (1996). Post-partum anoestrus in dairy cows: a review. Vet Quart., 18, 68-75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01652176.1996.9694620 PMid:8792599
25. Opsomer G.(2013). High yielding dairy cows: to produce or to reproduce and what practitioners should know about this to help their clients. Mac Vet Rev; 36 (2): 53-62.
26. Popovski, K., Kanchev, Lj. (1998). Endocrinology of reproduction. First Ed. Veterinaren institut i Veterinaren fakultet, Skopje
27. Pulley, S.L., Wallace, L.D., Mellieon, H. I. Jr., Stevenson, J.S. (2013). Ovarian characteristics, serum concentrations of progesterone and estradiol, and fertility in lactating dairy cows in response to equine chorionic gonadotropin. Theriogenology 79, 127–134. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2012.09.017 PMid:23131466
28. Rhodes, F. M., McDougall, S., Burke, C. R., Verkerk, G. A., Macmillan, K. L. (2003). Treatment of cows with an extended postpartum anestrous interval. J. Dairy Sci. 86, 1876–1894. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73775-8
29. Ryan, M, Mihm, M, Roche, J.F. (1998). Effect of GnRH given before or after dominance on gonadotrophin response and the fate of that follicle wave in postpartum dairy cows. J. Reprod. Fertil. Abstr Ser, 21, 61.
30. Santos, J.E.P., Rutigliano, H.M., Sá Filho, M.F. (2009). Risk factors for resumption of postpartum cyclicity and embryonic survival in lactating dairy cows. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 110, 207-221. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2008.01.014 PMid:18295986
31. Santos, JEP. (2011). Nutritional management of lactating dairy cows, dairy production medicine. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Ames, IO, USA
32. Smith, M.F., Perry, G.A., Atkins, J.A., Jinks, E.M., Pohler, K.G., Patterson, D.J. (2010). Physiological principles underlying synchronization of estrus. Appl. Reprod. Strat. Conf. Proc. August 5 & 6 Nashville, TN, USA
33. Townson, D.H., Tsang, P.C., Butler, W.R., Frajbla, M., Griel, L.C. Jr., Johnson, C.J., Milvae, R.A., Niksic, G.M., Pate, J.L. (2002). Relationship of fertility to ovarian follicular waves before breeding in dairy cows. J Anim. Sci. 80, 1053–1058. PMid:12008660
34. Wiltbank, M.C., Gumen, A., Sartori, R. (2002). Physiological classification of anovulatory conditions in cattle. Theriogenology 57, 21–52.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(01)00656-2
35. Xu, Z.Z., Garverick, H.A., Smith, G.W., Smith, M.E., Hamilton, S.A., Youngquist, R.S., (1995). Expression of follicle stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone receptor messenger ribonucleic acids in bovine follicles during the first follicular wave. Biol. Reprod., 52, 464–469.
36. Zdunczyk, S., Mwaanga, E.S., Tepicht, M.J., Baranski, W., Janowski, T. (2002). - Plasma progesterone levels and clinical findings in dairy cows with post-partum anoestrus. Bull.Vet.Inst. Pulawy 46, 79-86.


Copyright

© 2014 Atanasov B. This is an open-access article published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declared that they have no potential conflict of interest with respect to the authorship and/or publication of this article.

Citation Information

Macedonian Veterinary Review. Volume 37, Issue 2, Pages 171-177, p-ISSN 1409-7621, e-ISSN 1857-7415, DOI: 10.14432/j.macvetrev.2014.09.023, 2014